seen this post elsewhere? click for explanation

This post got banned from !memes@lemmy.world for reason “Troll Posting” which is Very Disrespectful in my opinion. 😕

I mean this meme with full respect and love to my fellow community members and I was proud of the discussion and support it was creating.

EDIT: POST RESTORED YAY. (Thank you to the mods it turned out to be a misunderstanding.)

Important clarification/FAQ: I am not calling to coddle or excuse the behavior of bigoted men in any way!

I am calling to be kind and understanding to young men (often ages 10-20) who are very manipulable and succeptible to the massive anti feminist propaganda machine. Hope this clarifies that very important distinction. :)

click this dropdown for comments that are very helpful and illustrate key points!
  • Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    For fucks sake maybe part of the problem is men are ALWAYS told to shut up and that their problems dont matter as much as literally any other population. I initially responded to the meme with annoyance, but understanding, but the constant creep of aggression that it keeps coming back with has started to trigger my own baggage.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hey! I am here to tell you don’t shut up. ❤️

      I am listening to and validating your stories. I don’t appreciate the other commenters jumping down your throat in this context.

      There are a lot of emotions running high on all sides. What is needed is a deep breath and open mindedness but that is hard under a post that is already a reaction to a reaction.

      If you haven’t already, check out !mensliberation@lemmy.ca, seen some positive stuff over there and I think you could find mutual value :)

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I literally just want to say thank you. I’ve been trying to get across something similar, and I’m sure we’d disagree on a few issues. But your compassion and understanding of all points of view is genuinely inspiring

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        +55 -2

        Hey! I am here to tell you don’t shut up. ❤️

        Removed by mod

        SMH

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was a divisive comment that was certainly fueled by already-high emotions, the mods may have just done what was necessary to keep toxicity and flaming at bay.

          I ask you to please not add fuel to the fire—nobody gains anything from the doubling down on hurt feelings. Listen to each other instead of trying to one-up.

    • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Men are always told to shut up? They run the whole damn world lmfao we are going into November with 2 geriatric men as the candidates ffs

      Biggest comics on stage? Men (many with a giant stage complaining they have no platform mind you)

      News and pundits? Men.

      CEO’s/c-suite execs? Men.

      Hey look a list of billionaires. Sure looks like a lot of men.

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        None of that has anything to do with the conversation. You’re only justifying the fact that you’re agreeing that men don’t get to have problems and should just shut up

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          When did I say anything remotely akin to “men don’t have problems and should just shut up”? Show me. When did anyone I supported say it? Show me.

      • beardown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Men don’t run the world, oligarchs run the world

        The homeless men you walk past on your way to work do not run the world

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You’re forgetting the “male” part of oligarchs.

          Saying a certain group has disproportionate representation does not mean literally everybody in that demographic is benefiting. I am a man, I am not a billionaire, the evidence is clear on that one. But we also both know that is not what I was saying, so that is as far as I’m willing to take this comment.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You’re forgetting the “male” part of oligarchs.

            Is it forgetting or, looking at the percentages, considering it irrelevant to the overall problems the system has?

            How large a percentage of men are oligarchs, and how large a percentage of oligarchs are women? Which one is, in <randomliberalcounttry>, the larger number? Would oligarchy be any better if all oligarchs were women? Now as an anarchist I might be biassed here but given that oligarchy is a system of rule I’d say it’s the actual problem, not the gender distribution that’s a mere nuance. I don’t care whether we’re all ruled by left-handed people, or ones with heterochromatic eyes, their geno- or phenotype doesn’t matter what matters is that they are in power. For more education, consult your friendly neighbourhood anarcho-feminist.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Oh not just “at this point” I’ve been busy figuring out what sticks with people vs. what doesn’t for at least two decades now. Points that, when prodded, don’t cause resistance, where some leverage can be applied that then may or may not avalanche into reevaluation of other topics which would be foolhardy to address directly. Dancing around the neuroses of the collective to enact my grand political vision of *checks notes* universal psychological health.

                That all said yes of course we also have issues with gender roles. It’s just that in terms of who sits at the big power levers that’s not terribly relevant any more, it’s not 1850 any more the dam has long since been breached and as women can inherit fortunes nowadays the gender distribution of oligarchs is bound to level out soon enough.

                • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  That’s called trying on opinions like hats. I don’t engage with people who pull that crap. It’s just another flavor of “devil’s advocate” where there is no burden to be consistent or stand by anything. Any pushback you face is met with abandoning the idea as if it was never stated. No thanks.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I’m perfectly consistent in my position, I simply chose to not engage where people’s underwear is twisted because a shouting match has never changed anyone’s mind.

    • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Do you realise how pathetic you sound? Women are told to shut their mouth and keep their opinions to themselves all the fucking time. It’s time for men like you to realise that sometimes yeah you should shut up and yeah your opinion is less important than the lived experience of women when it comes down to sexism and SA. Educate yourself please before you embarrass yourself even more.

      Invisible women is a great book to start. Very easy to read and full of interesting statistics.

      • beardown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s time for men like you to realise that

        Why are you talking to a 15 year old like that?

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Women are told to shut their mouth and keep their opinions to themselves all the fucking time.

        I think right about now would be a good time to check your privilege. People overall are told that all the time, yet somehow women still by and large have shoulders to cry on, places to complain where they’re heard. Wait, no, crying on shoulders, complaining, again, that would be pathetic for men never mind.

        • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Toxic masculinity exists. Women are also told to “remember their place” and act a certain way. Both are true.

          Work too much? Doesn’t take care of her family. Full time mom? Doesn’t have a real job. Asserts herself at work? Bossy and bitchy. Asks for assistance with her family? Bad mom. Black and asks for assistance with her family? Welfare Queen.

          Have you ever asked yourself why people only bring up male victims when we are talking about female victims? It’s like people who talk about homeless veterans whenever people advocate for the homeless writ large. The moment the discussion about the homeless fades away, those veteran homeless have served their purpose. As a cudgel to stop others from receiving help. We see this over and over again across all sorts of issues and demographics.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I mean yes I could have used the term “toxic masculinity” but men not steeped deeply in feminist theory tend to react badly to it, and self-identified feminists (usually also not quite firm in theory) getting called out for engaging in it tend to react even worse. And I already used quite a lot of budget on the privilege check, so, yeah, better avoid that one.

            • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              In 2024 the bar is still too low. Many men deny we need feminism at all, despite the fact that it benefits everyone. Gender roles and expectations are generally bad for everyone. Advocating for women generally is advocacy for men as well.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                (btw did you see my edit to your edit)

                Advocating for women generally is advocacy for men as well.

                In theory, yes. In practice you get self-avowed feminists reinforcing the patriarchy, hence why I did the privilege checking.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I replied to that purported bogeyman directly. Called out what you correctly identified as toxic masculinity.

        • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Facts don’t care about your feelings bro

          • 91% of SA victims are women, 99% of perpetrators are men;
          • women in the EU work 70 hours per week on average vs men who work 63 hour per week (this includes paid and unpaid work, women do about 3 times as much unpaid work as men)
          • number of women in the US who face workplace discrimination is 3 times higher than men
          • women politicians in the US face 3.4 times as much threats and harassment than men
          • car seats are only tested on male dummies resulting in women being 73% more likely to get seriously injured by a car crash
          • most medicines are only tested on male animals and or humans, resulting in lower efficacy among women and causing medicines that would be beneficial to women to go undiscovered

          Once again I recommend reading the book invisible women for more interesting statistics, and an analysis on gender specific data. It turns out that gender specific data is very hard to come by, making a lot of potential other gender gaps undiscovered. Women are much more likely than men to be victims of gender specific data gaps because women were not allowed to work for a long time and women still make up only a small fraction of executives making many women specific problems to stay undiscovered.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            I now could start a big list starting with men being four times more likely to commit suicide than women. But I won’t, because I assume you’re aware of all those gendered inequalities affecting men just as I was aware of every single one of the bullet points you mentioned.

            Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.

            • Hillary Clinton, 1998
              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                We weren’t talking about workplace discrimination, either. Or car seats. Or medicine. Or work hours. Those are real issues brought up in addition which I readily acknowledged and made no attempt at dismissing, nor did I spent more breath on a single male issue than any single one of the female issues got.

                We were talking about people’s experiences and pain getting silenced, and how none of it should get ignored. I suggest making that “if” into a “when” and lead by example.

                • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  This entire post is a reaction to a post about how unsafe women feel. Suicide among men is a very serious issue that should not be used as a cudgel to shout down or otherwise diminish the seriousness of other causes. Talking about the challenges women face doesn’t diminish the seriousness of men committing suicide at higher rates. Stop it.

                  By your logic, I should say “stop talking about men committing suicide when trans people commit suicide at a higher rate.“ Does that seem right to you? I sure hope not.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    This entire post is a reaction to a post about how unsafe women feel.

                    This entire post is about nuance in discussing that reaction. I quote from OP’s image:

                    The disenfranchisement and antagonization of young men leading to alt-right extremism is a real problem that can be addressed by being thoughtful of what methods of rhetoric are employed.


                    By your logic, I should say “stop talking about men committing suicide when trans people commit suicide at a higher rate.“ Does that seem right to you? I sure hope not.

                    First off, I never said that any of the issues should not be talked about, I said that none should get ignored.

                    Then, that’s actually an interesting intersection. Do you happen to have any data on whether the same disparity is present or not in trans folks, ideally distinguishing between pre- and post-transition?

                    My off the cuff hypothesis would be low to no statistical significance pre-transition as transphobia and general psychological turmoil is an overwhelming factor, and a definitely significant but lower disparity post-transition on account of selection bias towards resiliency as well as good self-knowledge and self-actualisation being a protecting factor.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do you realise how pathetic you sound? Women are told to shut their mouth and keep their opinions to themselves all the fucking time.

        Yikes.

      • bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Dude when I read that book and learned female/pregnant crash test dummies didn’t exist until like 5 years ago I was speechless. Decades of research and stats showing women were being disproportionately hurt/killed in car crashes despite over half a century of consistent safety improvements and testing. No one thought to include them. Just baffling.