• Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    As a software engineer, the thought of my code being responsible for someone’s safety is fucking terrifying. Thankfully I’m not in that kind of position.

    From experience though, I can tell you that most of the reasons software is shitty is because of middle or upper management, either forcing idiotic business requirements (like a subscription where it doesn’t fucking belong!) or just not allocating time to button things up. I can guarantee that every engineer that worked on that thing hated it and thought it was fucking stupid.

    Licensing would be overkill for most software as it’s not usually life and death. I think in this case since it’s safety equipment it really should have been rejected by NHTSA before it ever hit stores.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I can guarantee that every engineer that worked on that thing hated it and thought it was fucking stupid.

      As a software engineer who was also a civil engineer-in-training before switching careers, I think one of the big overlooked benefits of being licensed is that it would give engineers leverage to push back on unethical demands by management.

      • Technus@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Management can always just fire the engineering team and hire one overseas. It’s not like it’s even that difficult to do.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I don’t think you understand what being licensed means. It means the state requires that people doing that job hold a license. Offshoring would become illegal.