Will that achieve anything?
People know the effects, people see the effects, people don’t care.
Just seems like a silly outdated idea. Isn’t it well established that the best way to stop people from buying stuff like this is plain white packaging and advertising restrictions?
I think I’m much more humble than you’d understand.
The longer version of what the cigarette’s called
I mean, if it’s a valid word for what they want to say, then I don’t really see a problem. It’s pronounced the same, but it’s a completely different word.
Same with a pork meatball or cigarette in the UK.
Stupid horse, I just fell out of the Porsche
Well when the alternative is Bing quality search results, Google still has a slight edge.
That gap is closing by the day tho.
If my dogs ever tried to kill me, I’d just pin them both down. That’s the benefit of not having insanely powerful dogs.
IMO you shouldn’t have a dog that you can’t physically restrain. Any dog can snap and you need to be able to physically stop them if that happens.
This beef is everywhere.
It’s like the Pokémon Go of rap, everyone’s interested.
Fallouts always been one of those games that’s broken into the mainstream tho, I’d put it up there with COD and FIFA tbh…
This isn’t some sort of niche game that’s suddenly getting mainstream attention, if anything it’s always been a game for “casuals” (no offence intended, just can’t think of a better way to say it).
I’d say that the market being brought in is the one that Bethesda was aiming for since at least Fallout 4.
Yeah, there seemed to be a lot of crossroad moments in the show where Daenerys was leaning towards violence, but was persuaded to show some level of mercy.
Kinda off topic, but in the midst of all the Benioff & Weiss (deserved) hate, people started saying they fucked up Daenerys’ story as well…
I just don’t get that, I thought they planted throughout the entire series that she’s genuinely unstable and might snap.
Was it poorly executed? Yes. But I don’t think they fucked up the core idea behind her character arc, which is what I saw a lot of people angry with.
Are there actually photogenic people who look worse on video or irl?
If they’re photogenic surely they just look good all the time, I can’t think of any examples of photogenic looking worse on video.
What can I say 🤷♂️
I’m just a man, with a penis, changing the world one load at a time
Thanks, saved for later.
I’m doing my part, for the troops 🫡
I like how the landlord duties they mention are usually completed by other people.
They pay tradesmen to fix things and a lot rely on management companies to handle the houses/tenants. The cost of those services is then passed onto the tenant in the form of higher rent.
Isn’t that common with lots of major cities?
Do I look like I know hwat a jpeg is?
Hmm, you say they’re unnecessary, and yet you are in a situation where people say they’re uncomfortable around you…
If you don’t bother with white lies and think that goes down okay, then maybe the other person is pretending they’re okay with it when it does actually bother them.
So they’re then telling a white lie of their own to spare your feelings, or just because they want to move on from the subject.
This is something I do occasionally when I look at an old post on Reddit.
Sometimes you find some interesting stuff that you wouldn’t expect based on their original comment.
Fairly often it’s just online sex and posts about mobile games tho.