as a person that came from the 3rd world country and new in fediverse environment, i genuinely would like to know about this.

edit: thanks for the replies! sorry, i literally don’t know the reason since i’m not a western lol. twitter/x is too biased especially when musk openly supports trump so i came here and seeing fediverse is mostly are harris or biden (when he’s still up for the candidate) supporters. don’t know about reddit tho, i only use reddit as a forum for linux and programming stuff.

  • Antiproton@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are plenty of Trump supporters here. Every comment from someone who implies one shouldn’t vote for Harris because of the Israel-Gaza war is likely someone trying to suppress Democrat turnout. Single issue voting is the only way the GOP ever win.

    • OutsizedWalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Gaza posts always make me laugh because they completely ignore that Trump would just glass Gaza.

      The only reason Trump hasn’t showed how terrible he’d be on Gaza is because he isn’t president right now.

          • Skeezix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Have you stopped to consider that labelling someone as the “enemy” is parlance mostly engaged in by conservatives? Progressives don’t usually think in those terms. To a progressive, you might be ignorant, misinformed, misguided, deluded, xenophobic, racist, or engaging in bad faith, but you are rarely the “enemy.” Even Trump himself although perhaps though of as an “enemy of democracy,” is not a personal enemy. Your response using that metaphor serves to highlight the conservative mind set of making it personal, and harboring an anger so deep that political disagreement is grounds for personal animosity and even violence.

            • FlorianSimon@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 months ago

              Some people cause so much harm that, fuck it, they’re enemies. It doesn’t matter that Adolf McHitlerface had a terrible childhood. Overwhelming violence was a legitimate mean to put an end to his action.

              You won’t be able to fix everyone, and not everybody with a terrible life becomes a fascist.

              Trump doesn’t care that you have an open mind and are willing to try to change him. Give him the chance, and he’ll let you know what he thinks of your good nature.

              I’m not dehumanizing him. He’s not the antichrist. He’s in fact terribly human. But not all humans deserve rehabilitation, especially when they’re actively causing harm. When a terrorist shoots people at a concert, it’s absolutely OK to kill them to prevent innocent deaths.

              It’s OK to take a stance, sometimes. And you don’t always need to be very civil about it.

            • Bgugi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              2 months ago

              I like how you’re so high up on your horse that not only does is your team too good to have enemies, you can doublethink away any use of the term as impersonal.

              • Communist_Synthesizer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The US had a 2x mortality rate of Canada. 6x higher compared to South Korea, 10x of Japan the first two years of Covid. Even going with the lowest number, about 500,000 Americans could have survived with even marginally competent leadership. One that might not have…

                1. Disbanded the Pandemic response team Obama set up.
                2. Undercut the messaging from the CDC because Trump couldn’t handle Fauci having a higher approval rating than him.
                3. Spewed constant misinformation about everything from bleach, sunlight to ivermectin while professionals were desperately trying to do their job.
                4. Intentionally dragging his feet on the relief effort because someone told him that it was hitting the cities first and the Democrats would be most affected.
                5. Goddamn masks. All he had to do was go on TV and tell his little cultists to wear the damn things, and we could have prevented so much of the deaths that came from the original strain/Delta. (Not Omicron)

                … Hitler killed less Americans than Trump did. That’s just facts.

                • Bgugi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The “disbanding” of the pandemic response team is largely misrepresented. I don’t disagree with the rest, or see how it’s at all relevant to the current conversation.

                  • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    How is it misrepresented?

                    The Global Health Security and Biodefense unit — responsible for pandemic preparedness — was established in 2015 by Barack Obama.

                    In May 2018, the team was disbanded and its head Timothy Ziemer, top White House official for leading U.S. response against a pandemic, left the Trump administration.

                    Republicans have claimed it was ‘streamlining’ as opposed to elimination, since some members of the team were reassigned to other roles related to pandemic response, but the team was disbanded under the trump administration, that’s just a fact.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      45
      ·
      2 months ago

      You: “Hitler can’t take back office, but we do need to continue the concentration camps. People who don’t want concentration camps are directly supporting Hitler.”

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      75
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My brother in christ you cannot compromise on fucking genocide. Liberals like you are so fucking scared of the orange man that you are willing to let hundreds of thousands die without even asking for better.

      • _core@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If all you’re voting on is how they respond to Gaza, Harris isn’t great but Trump is exponentially worse. He’s openly said that Israel should continue what they’re doing. In fact, in every metric of comparison Trump is exponentially worse. It’s not that we’re scared of Trump, it’s that he is so much worse in every regard.

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          53
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah no shit but im not gonna settle for genocide. Slower genocide is still genocide and if I can do anything to prevent the murder of hundreds of thousands of people I will do so. I genuinely believe that witholding my vote and protesting has a chance of altering Harris’ position here.

          • Vent@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            What good does altering Harris’s position do if she doesn’t win?

            • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              30
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              If she wins without ceasing material support for actual genocide then we have failed as a people. Politicans are beholden to us not the other way around. It is our demands they should listen to not the demands of raytheon, boeing, palantir, and others that uphold their wealth and power.

              Thats not even mentioning the fact that not supporting genocide basically guarantees her win. This is an incredible popular position that many many people passionately care about. She supports genocide because she wants to

              • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                But what good is punishing Harris by withdrawing your vote? What does this even do except inch everything closer to Trump - who will make the issue you’re prioritizing, worse?

                • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  It tells her that she might fucking lose if she doesn’t change her stance. Do you really think a politician will do anything for the people if they can win without doing it? How do you think politics works? Asking nicely? I’m exerting political pressure not “punishing her”

                  • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I think you are misunderstanding the nature of the conflict. The war is between Iran and Israel. Gaza is just one tiny battlefield in the larger war. Iran and its proxies don’t want to solve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. Cui bono? Iran and its proxies, that’s who. Kamala Harris knows this. She isn’t stupid and she is well-advised by experts. You and your fellow protesters aren’t helping at all, you are just making her job of defeating Trump harder. Wake up, my friend.

                    Hezbollah and Hamas are Iranian proxies that have wrecked Lebanon and Gaza respectively. Hamas’s murderous attack on Israeli civilians on October 7 was all about creating chaos, provoking Israel, and undermining the Abraham Accords. It wasn’t about solving the problems of the Palestinian people, it was done to further Iran’s “Axis of Resistance” goals. In that sense, Hamas’s October 7 operation was very similar in nature and purpose to Bin Laden’s 9/11 plan, and Israel is responding much the same as the US did back in the early 2000s against the Taliban and al-Qaeda.

                    Iran and Hamas started the current clash with the purpose of provoking Israel into a drastic response in Gaza. Gazan civilians are caught in the middle, but if you think it’s Israel’s fault, you are falling exactly in line with what Iran and their proxies intended.

                    The Russians, for all their faults, have a well-developed sense of realpolitik, and they have a term for people like you and your fellow protesters: useful idiots. I prefer the term “naive but well-intentioned”, but there is quite a lot of overlap in this case. That “naive but well-intentioned” outlook is fine, even laudable, most of the time, but it is quite unhelpful at this moment when the competition between Harris and Trump is so close.

            • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Harris is materially supporting a genocide and uncritically parroting the rhetoric of israeli fascist. I am telling people not to vote for her because she too is a fascist. Should she stop supporting this slaughter then I would happily encourage everyone to vote for her

              • medgremlin@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                America is, unfortunately, a two party system. If not enough people vote for Harris, Trump wins. Period. There are no options besides Harris and Trump, and only one of them has talked about how Israel should literally nuke Gaza (I’ll let you take a guess on which one it was.)

                I see your idealism, and I agree that any amount of genocide is unacceptable, but letting Trump win will just accelerate the genocide in Gaza, expand it to the West Bank (more noticeably, anyways), and likely start new genocides here in America. I’ve been writing to my representatives and sending them articles about the atrocities being committed by the IDF and imploring them to do something about it…but I’m not dumb enough to withhold my vote from the Centrists and allow the Fascists to take over.

                I repeat: withholding your vote from Harris is effectively a vote for Trump because America is a two party system, and there’s only two options to pick from.

                • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I’ll withhold my vote from trump then I guess. Fascism isn’t something you can vote away, its roots are entirely systemic and the Democrats have no desire to do away with it anyway. People being scared of fascism is basically their best argument for getting elected these days. It’s very useful for them.

                  Besides, what incentive do the Democrats have to change their policy if they won’t lose a single voter. I’m not so naive that I believe politicians in either party determine policy based off morality.

                  • medgremlin@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    There are lower ranking Democrats that are espousing the right ideas about things like the filibuster, gerrymandering, and even some that are agitating about the electoral college BS. The best strategy I see right now is to clear as many Republicans out of office as we can, and support the newer, lower-level representatives that are aiming to affect real change.

                    My voting strategy has always been to “vote blue, no matter who” on the top of the ticket, then do my research and be more selective about the offices lower down, especially in the primaries. Unfortunately, it doesn’t matter if more progressive candidates take hold of the House and the Senate if everything they pass just gets vetoed by the fascist in the Oval Office anyways.

            • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              Whichever candidate is willing to end the genocide not that I’d believe trump if he said he would. I’ll vote third party if necessary

              • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Harris is working to end the genocide right now. She’s fighting for a permanent ceasefire and two state solution. That might not be your preferred way to resolve the conflict, but it would stop the carnage and give Palestine more leverage to negotiate on the world stage.

                  • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    She can’t end all weapon supplies to Israel, she’s the vice president.

                    Even Biden couldn’t do it, he paused shipments and Congress passed a bill forcing them to resume. The power of the president is limited, especially when a super majority of Congress are firmly committed to sending weapons to Israel.

                  • medgremlin@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    You do realize that she’s the Vice President and doesn’t actually have any authority or power unless Biden kicks the bucket, right?

                    Because it really seems like you think that she has any ability to make unilateral decisions or enact her policy platform right this second, and that simply isn’t the case.

          • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            The Americans are lost. Their version of democracy has collapsed over their own heads. In a way, they deserve this shit. If they put all this crappy energy into unitedly voting for third candidate, it just might work. But nope, gotta wake up every day and go online to accuse people who refuse a second holocaust of being tRuMp SupPorTers.

            Free thought is dead in America and the Americans killed it.

            Go ahead downvote me to fucking hell, haters.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s so hard to take people seriously who talk like turbo redditors. My BrOtHeR iN lOw KeY cHrIsT.

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thats fair but it’s probably just a generational or regional divide. For instance, I personally can’t take people who use that form of text capitalization seriously. No shame though I just associate it with 7th grade

          • WldFyre@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just associate it with 7th grade

            You’re not gonna believe this, but I’m pretty sure that was the intent, to mock you

      • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Somehow people think that pointing out that anyone who isn’t Trump are pro-genocide means that Trump somehow isn’t pro-genocide.

        Like you’re not allowed to think about two problems at once. Or that there are no other options…

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I get that but I’m not gonna criticize trump for being pro-genocide bc we can’t do shit fuck about that. Atleast with Harris there is a slim chance of changing her position on the matter by witholding votes and being vocal about it. Stop doing genocide has gotta be the most reasonable political demand to exist right?

          • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes. Exactly! The reason people keep bitching about Harris and genocide is because they hope something might actually happen about it.

            Biden was an absolutely terrible candidate (that I was going to vote for) and probably the only person who could lose against Trump. Because people constantly bitched about how bad he was they changed the candidate.

            Harris doesn’t get to use Trump as a not-as-bad-as screen, and given that we don’t have the option of not voting for her, everyone should be applying every other available form of pressure to discourage her from enabling genocide or otherwise maintaining the status quo.

            • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Now is not the time. After she is elected, get out there and put the pressure on her. But it makes no sense to risk the fate of the entire country on this.

              • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                This will come as an absolute shock to you. You can vote for someone you criticize…

                Which party was it that dogpiles on anyone that dares criticize their shitty candidates again?

                The point of saying it before the election is that the expectations are set.

                • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I can understand that you can vote for someone you criticize. But it’s obviously implied that you’re withholding your vote unless the administration changes their tune, which means you’re not voting for someone you’re criticizing at the moment. If not, then you have nothing to pressure with.

                  I am all for constructive criticism but I still don’t think this is an effective means to accomplish getting this point across.

                  • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Obviously implied? So there’s nothing in my comment that directly contradicts that and will make you look really silly in a moment?

              • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                What kind of democracy is one where you can’t even criticize the candidate because “it’s not the right time” right before the elections when the candidates are forced to make changes to make the public happy? After they are in power, it’s another 4 years of BS, and by the third year the same cycle begins and you are not allowed to criticize your candidate.