No matter what the polls ever say, the most important thing to do is vote and encourage others to vote.

  • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 months ago

    Personally, I don’t like to trust commentary on FiveThirtyEight’s tracker from anyone other than FiveThirtyEight. They do a fantastic job of tempering expectations and not putting too much stock in momentary changes in the tracker. The current numbers are basically the same as they were on May 11:

    It hasn’t changed much, even after all the wild shiz that has happened since May 11. Furthermore, the polls usually work on a delay, so they haven’t yet factored in the assassination attempt, or the RNC. And often, the tracker stays at a dead-even heat largely because their statistical model factors in uncertainty from the 4 months between now and Election Day.

    All of that is to say: the race is still essentially dead-even. Like Chris said in the OP, the most important thing to do is vote and encourage others to vote, no matter what the polls say.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 months ago

        Republicans still show up to vote and reliably vote party line. The only way to beat them is motivating people to vote against them in battleground states.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Less viewers because fewer people are engaged or because people already know who they’re voting for?

        Republicans vote Republican. 2016 was an anomaly because Trump was an unknown factor and a voice for change in the RNC. I doubt many people’s opinions on Trump have shifted since 2020 and the Republican candidate was a foregone conclusion.

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Exactly, I think because races have been so close lately, and the probabilities are ending up close to 50% often, people sometimes unintentionally conflate them with poll numbers. 53% to 46% would be a massive poll lead. For probabilities though in this situation it’s the same as saying they have even odds of winning. Look at those massive 95% confidence intervals, the race is in a statistical dead heat. It’s kind of remarkable how steady it has been despite all the wild events that have happened.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        538 has an explanation on their site about why it’s not moving. Essentially they’re so far out they heavily discount current polls and events. We’re effectively seeing their baseline result with some previous races and economic measures tweaking things a little.

        • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yes, that’s true. The poll averages themselves haven’t moved much either though. And the reliance on the fundamentals forecast has me nervous, but they definitely do it for a reason. When they developed the models and looked at poll history the pattern they found was the fundamentals had a big influence on what the polls would look like closer to the election and the eventual result. Polls closer to the election are more predictive than the fundamentals. Polls farther away from the election less so. There’s at least some reason to think things have changed enough maybe the fundamentals aren’t as fundamental for this race, but I guess we won’t know until afterward.

    • chaos@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a new model this year, as Nate Silver took his with him when he left 538. The new one seems to put a lot of emphasis on “the fundamentals” this far out, that is, it “thinks” that the general environment and economy and such is pretty good for the incumbent and that the polls might move in that direction by the time election day comes along. And since it’s fitted to historical data, it’s also implicitly assuming that this election will be similar to past elections (like, say, including a competent campaign by a candidate who can get out there and effectively communicate accomplishments and a plan for their term).

      I personally think those assumptions are pretty clearly wrong this year and so I’m more inclined to base my perception of the race on pure polling averages, which are looking quite bad for Biden.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    538’s win projections aren’t really based on current polling or really current events at all, that’s why nothing’s moved despite crazy things happening in the race. They’ve got some other fundamentals in the model that makes them think it’s all going to revert to norm and Democrats will win, but it’s just their own guesswork, not anything particularly well supported.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Assassination attempts don’t correlate with wins per se. Neither does debate performance.

      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Popularity doesn’t even correlate with wins. There are people who will do whatever they can to prevent Trump from being elected, there are people who will do whatever they can to prevent the radical liberal cabal from being elected, and there are those who won’t vote (for one of a multitude of reasons). Everyone else is statistically insignificant.