The author completely misses the fact that Biden went to Israel to advocate for limited (or no) ground incursion at all. Literally no one wants this. He’s even asking china to talk to Iran, because he knows that china really doesn’t want this.
TL;DR Author of this opinion piece only reads headlines and not actual news of what is going on.
🤔 Interesting . . . I’m not saying I don’t believe you, but do you have some links to back this up? Would like to read up on this.
Sorry, I was reading an article today and it popped into my head that I had never responded to you. This article specifically referenced it which is why it popped into my head:
https://news.yahoo.com/us-asks-israel-explanation-strike-192900314.html?guccounter=1
Before Israel’s ground operation into Gaza, the Biden administration had been urging Israel to conduct a “more surgical” operation instead of a full-scale invasion due to the high potential for both civilian and IDF casualties, said the first U.S. official.
This is very paraphrased in the article, but the gist of it is correct.
There are articles on the China part of it but they got buried quickly. Basically The Biden admin was asking china to talk to Iran to try to get them to chill a bit so that things don’t end up going completely off the rails. Keep in mind that Hezbollah is basically state sponsored by Iran, so this isn’t just Iran the country being asked to chill out, but Hezbollah as well. And it worked as far as I can tell, because Hezbollah put out a statement the other day being inflammatory pricks like they are but also showed some restraint (of which the article took note), which is notable.
Edit: Here is the article I was talking about: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israel-hezbollah-gaza-hamas-lebanon-b2441350.html
Read that and then ask yourself… Does this sound like the Hezbollah I know about? Because the Hezbollah I know of would be ass deep in Jihad right now.
Hamas wanted to start a regional war, and didn’t think that the US would have a musclur response. But the US did, and for now the cork is in the Lebanon bottle. Now geniuses like this think that’s the wrong way to go.
I feel like you didn’t read the opinion piece at all, and just ran with your feelings from the title. In the first two paragraphs the author talks about how I agreed with the strong initial response to the terrorist attack. It’s the wonton targeting of civilians and looking the other way as language of genocide is being used that the author, and every else that I know that isn’t blindly pro one side or the other takes.
I’ve seen the secondary explosions of Hamas tunnels hit right next to the Gaza hospital. I’ve seen Hamas reports of commanders dieing from Israeli bombs near Rahfa. Maybe what the author calls “wonton targeting” isn’t exactly true all the time. Maybe he’s confused about where Hamas likes to hang out. Maybe he doesn’t understand that the US forced Israel to turn up Gaza’s internet yesterday. Since he doesn’t understand the geopolitics, probably doesn’t understand that either.
