I feel as though this take is fully fud. It sounds like a take that came from seeing tons of advertisements for vpns without really understanding how they work. Maybe I’m wrong about you. That said, in general, a VPN is not a great cloak for piracy.
I feel as though this take is fully fud. It sounds like a take that came from seeing tons of advertisements for vpns without really understanding how they work. Maybe I’m wrong about you. That said, in general, a VPN is not a great cloak for piracy.
What is your damage?
I looked in their post history and don’t see where you reached this conclusion. It’s clear to me that you are just saying that in order to… Save face because you’ve got nothing?
Big oof.
Grasping at strings.
You may find it insulting, but that doesn’t mean it’s incorrect and it most certainly is not name-calling.
Telling someone that they are being naive is not an insult. You should be old enough to understand that by this point in your life.
For BIDEN.
Exactly what do you think is going to happen when you try to swap in someone else? The Republicans are known for acting in good faith. I’m sure nothing bad would happen.
Yes, that’s correct. The article is from a month ago, where Ohio was trying to keep Biden off of the ballot due to DNC / state procedural bullshit.
Swap the candidate for someone else and surprise Pikachu when red states refuse to print them on the ballot.
That’s is not calling someone a name. Ffs. That is a descriptor.
“You are being naive”
Is not the same as
“Dumbass”
It is 1 months old. It’s also true. The DNC had to pull some fast changes in order to make it happen.
FOR BIDEN.
Do you want to rest on the good will of the politicians in red states for that “trust me bro” guarantee that your new candidate will be on the ballot?
If it is a red state, then they could simply refuse. You do realize that there were a couple of states that were trying to keep Biden off of the ballot using the existing deadlines as a method, right???
Please point to the place where I name called someone.
You should read your own source. This is basically saying that if Republicans allow it to happen the name could be changed. Talk about naive.
How so? The legislation in those states has no mechanism for changing the ballots that I am aware of. You would run a significant risk of have ballots in multiple states with only Trump’s name on them.
I don’t think THEY would be stupid enough, but this was aimed at helping the everyday folk, aka, you and me understand and think of the ramifications…
Then you clearly were not paying attention because the number one issue is ballot access. It is too late. No other candidate can be on the ballots in many (if not all states).
That is a full stop no go right there.
I feel as though you didn’t watch the video. You should watch it.
There is one particularly insurmountable issue with that.
It’s important to note that a VPN is simply somebody else’s network in another location.