![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmygrad.ml/pictrs/image/Zxpw6jw0fE.png)
In their defense, it’s free for personal use. If they want to milk enterprise clients who can’t be bothered updating their systems, who cares
In their defense, it’s free for personal use. If they want to milk enterprise clients who can’t be bothered updating their systems, who cares
Aren’t LTS versions of ubuntu supported for five years? Why do you need “Pro” for security updates?
Capitalism breeds innovation
Themes are also locked behind nitro. Discord’s latest innovation: charging people for simple css files that could be freely distributed and shared among users.
Can you cash out the gold for real money? I doubt it, so it will not be the “poor guy trying to earn some cents” type of spam, it will be the classic redditors trying to farm awards circlejerk which has plagued reddit for a long time
Imagine the following scene straight out of the science fiction storybook,” he writes. “You are beamed into a town full of people going about their business, trading in gadgets, clothes, shoes, books, songs, games and movies. At first everything looks normal. Until you begin to notice something odd. It turns out all the shops, indeed every building, belongs to a chap called Jeff.
Isn’t this analogous to company towns that paid you in scrip? It seems to me that more people would get behind him if he argued that we’ve “regressed” to worse capitalist practices than saying that capitalism is dead.
Not really, since bits and bytes represent the same dimension of data.
Your argument is like saying “why say a car can do km/h when it is really m/s”
How so? You get a detailed bill each 2-3 months, and the percentage each apartment pays is always the same. It’s not a random dude pooling together money each month, there’s a detailed process involved. There are managerial firms that take over the process if the people at building decide so, at like 1 euro or so per apartment (per month)
The issues with this system are people not paying and that it’s harder to maintain the building before something breaks (plus “aesthetic” expenses, such as painting it) because people don’t want to pay more
That’s true if one person owns every other apartment in the building, but it could be the case that every apartment is owned by different people.
That’s usually the case here in Greece. No one owns the building itself and everyone pays a monthly amount towards the building’s utility bills (the costs of running the elevator, entrance lights etc). The larger your apartment the more you contribute. When the apartment is rented, the renter usually pays the bill, but when there’s maintenance costs involved (for example, the building’s elevator broke), the landlord pays that part.
He is coming from a country that suffered terrorist attacks organized by the US (Operation Mongoose), being ready to fire his country’s deterrent weapons if they don’t stop receiving such attacks makes sense to me.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cuba-trafficking-idUSKBN1WC00X
I wouldn’t trust the country that tried to assassinate Cuba’s leader, overthrow their government and organized terrorist attacks in its land to have valid criticisms for Cuba.
https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/07/23/cuba-repressive-rules-doctors-working-abroad
Health workers may also face criminal penalties if they “abandon” their jobs.
This sounds bad, but then again they’re on a foreign mission, with their country’s reputation on the line. A considerable amount of health workers abandoning their jobs might make the mission infeasible, which could create diplomatic issues for Cuba. Also, I wonder if that’s the case on soldiers (American or otherwise) on foreign missions. I would expect that they can’t abandon their jobs without penalty, and I don’t see how this is that different.
it is considered a “disciplinary offense” to have “relationships” with anyone whose “actions are not consistent with the principles and values of the Cuban society,” as well as to be “friends or establish any other links” with Cuban dissidents, people who have “hostile or contrary views to the Cuban revolution,” or who are “promoters of a way of life contrary to the principles that a Cuban collaborator abroad must represent.”
Again, these seem restrictions that would apply on soldiers on foreign missions, so it doesn’t seem weird to me that they apply to Cuba’s medical missions.
Under Resolution 168, doctors need “authorization and instructions” to “express opinions” to the media about “internal situations in the workplace” or that “put the Cuban collaboration at risk.” It is also an offense to “disseminate or propagate opinions or rumors that undermine the morals or prestige of the group or any of its members.”
I believe Cuba wouldn’t need to enforce this if they weren’t under -economic- siege by the US and their allies. What the doctors do or say on the missions could be the start of a diplomatic incident.
Others said they joined in the hope of leaving the country or of obtaining access to food, such as meat, which they cannot buy with their salaries in Cuba.
I can’t help but wonder if meat would be cheaper in Cuba without the embargo against them.
Ian also happens to be dead
How is that, in any way, answering the question?! You could mention some of those features…
How is that not a conclusion? Just because capitalism is about having free markets doesn’t mean that price caps have no place in it. To me, it’s the same as saying that regulations have no place in capitalism.
I also don’t see how I was being adversarial.
This doesn’t seem like an unsolvable problem, so I don’t understand why someone would conclude that price caps “never” work just because they can lead to some problems.
Having to wait some time to buy an apt seems like a better choice than being priced out for a much longer period (or forever)
Do you also consider remembering to take your wallet and phone with you a hassle? You’re creating an issue where there isn’t one.
But OK, have a smartphone and use it to take photo-notes, I do that too. But I also try to use libre alternatives for software even if they are not as good as their proprietary counterparts, because that’s the right thing to do for a lot of reasons.
Also funny that you’re mentioning lawnmowers, because tractors have a huge issue with proprietary software, with farmers having to resort to hacking their (bought!) vehicles in order to repair them, to avoid paying thousands of dollars to John Deere for “authorized” (read: extorted) repairs.
You agree that the corpos are “evil” and yet you do nothing to avoid using their software, you’re not willing to be discomforted in the slightest for a good cause. That’s worse than Stallman’s approach, in my book.
Why didn’t you bring a small notepad, easily fitted in a pocket or small bag to take notes of things to remember, instead of a camera? Dumb phones may have had note functionalities too, I’m not sure.
Stallman gives plenty of alternatives instead of just forbidding technology, but you’re gonna brand them ‘non-viable’ so there’s no reason to give you a list.
grep file ...