That is a horrific endorsement and Dick Cheney is a monster.

The US Army says tampons are fine for patching bullet wounds in an emergency.

This is exactly what I was thinking of. American liberals are almost entirely ignorant of how much violence their government exports – and especially how much of it is targeted specifically at leftists. Marxists haven’t gained power in the US because any time they started to build working-class support they got murdered.

Not really a surprise; the political establishment of even the Republican party got really sick of Trump during his time in office because of the chaos. He didn’t behave like the typical useful idiot President and torpedoed a couple of easy legislative victories by tweeting in rage when they were almost through Congress.

“Marxists have failed to gain power because they think too much” is one hell of a liberal elitist take from the author of this article.

When “we have a right to defend ourselves” is the excuse given for genocide it’s completely unreasonable

Isn’t this literally two days after she parroted the Zionist mantra “israel has a right to defend itself”?

I’m a Trump hater but this sounds like serious exaggeration

Every foreign government at this point knows Trump is really easy to bribe and influence, so they want him back in charge. Certainly not unique to China.

Why did the RNC invite a union president to speak in the first place? Seems very out-of-character especially considering what he said on stage

The Supreme Court idea of judicial review was, essentially, created by an early Chief Justice using the classic children’s excuse “the rules don’t say I can’t do this so therefore I’m doing it and you can’t stop me”

Edit: I had this somewhat wrong. After reading, it seems a lot of the people who wrote and debated on the Constitution wrote strongly in support of judicial review, and it was in fact voted on and approved by multiple state legislatures after the Constitution was adopted. It simply wasn’t worded explicitly into the Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall did issue an official ruling that made it a standard practice but it was not a new concept.

I’m referring to this, in the article.

The conservative justices appointed by his rival, former President Donald Trump, are “already gutting voting rights, overturning Roe, decimating affirmative action, and so much more,” Biden said. “Are we going to let that happen? We can’t.”

The Democrats are, in fact, letting it happen.

Yet another blatant, pandering lie.

Agree, and its very start was as a government-sponsored hit squad extrajudicially murdering bank robbers under the direction of an extremely troubled man. It’s never strayed far from its roots.

We absolutely can, but “organizing” doesn’t mean the same thing to a Democrat as it does to me.

The largest suggestion in this article is: “call out the people who suppress voting and call them vote suppressors”. Words have near-zero impact on the people passing these laws.

Peaceful methods simply will not work anymore. They’ve been tried for decades and the Republicans do not care. Their only goal is winning and in many states they have won in a semi-permanent way by redrawing districts and suppressing nonwhite votes.

Depends. In some states it doesn’t matter at all.

The most important thing to know is our voting system is broken far beyond its original design and won’t get fixed any time soon.

Maybe if it was a joke about leftist infighting it’d be understandable

Finally, a title for that asshole that feels completely appropriate. Florida Man.

Pretty much anything the US government doesn’t like that isn’t by a near-peer state actor gets labeled as terrorism