Kalingrad gonna kalingrad.
Kalingrad gonna kalingrad.
Attempting to apply anything resembling personal values to Macron is an error.
They’re instituting this for the generation that grew up with Vpns so they could watch pirate streaming sites on their school Wi-Fi? Good fucking luck.
It’s not about understanding. I’m explicitly stating that it’s a distinction without a difference. I know exactly what you’re saying and I’m telling you it doesn’t matter. There is no functional disparity if the result is the same.
You’re not using power to make things better in that case. You’re ACTUALLY using power to make things worse by following unconstitutional orders. But you feel bad about it.
If you’re carrying out orders in knowing violation of your constitutional oath you are complicit and the institution is inherently corrupt.
I’m making an ethical must statement, not an ethical ought statement. If you believe you’re carrying out orders as a civil servant that violate your constitutional oath like they state in the letter you must resign. There’s no gray area there.
Since even the cops are homeless, that’s likely.
If you think you’re violating your constitutional oath, you gotta stop drop and roll, not sign an anonymous letter.
You pretty much either put so much heat into urea that it turns to ammonia and melts your plastic while doing so or you wait for some bacteria to eat it and turn it into ammonia. It technically starts vaporizing at above 130 C.
Zap was only well intentioned in that he was a narcissist who desperately wanted people to like him. He was a consistent shithead.
I don’t think you’ll ever get a concrete answer on this because different people treat even basic numbers differently none the less assigning value to them. I like upvoted/downvote view because I like being able to see what’s controversial. It means a comment is both important to show a dividing line but also might be misleading.
Edit: note of course, I’m saying this while on an instance that doesn’t even federate downvotes at the moment.
deleted by creator
That’s quite different than attacking directly over the airspace of NATO members.
If anyone died that would’ve been article 5. Are they nuts?
It needed breaking anyway. Let’s make some rainbows.
It makes sense. Coal in English is a word that originally meant a burning ember and likely related to charcoal that we then changed to exclusively mean rock coal. Since it didn’t happen until the 1300s and we were producing charcoal long before that.
If anything charcoal is redundant. It’s a word with an origin like “burned burned” (though char comes from change, not burn)
I wouldn’t grill with anything but anthracite and even then, I don’t know that I would. You guys actually use coal from the ground at bbqs? We mostly use charcoal which is pyrolysed wood
It’s possible to craft a public company that has bylaws strict enough to make it like a good nonprofit, but why would you do that and still pay taxes?
Either an AI wrote this or somebody needs to take the author’s fucking thesaurus. He has ceased to be. He’s shuffled off his mortal coil, run down the curtain, and joined the choir invisible. He is an Ex-pig kidney transplant recipient.