![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/75a9d402-ce78-46df-a836-d6006ab32e65.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
From UPFs specifically…?
From UPFs specifically…?
Why would that be frustrating? That’s explicitly what they’re for. And we’re better off for it.
I’d love summer if it was like spring the whole time. Without the pollen.
Those elephant-sized sloths seem pretty cool.
They’d be popular, sure. But no way as popular and in public imagination as all the behemoths.
Like, there were a ton of dog-sized dinosaurs. You’ve never seen or heard of most of them.
Then that would be a reaction to an article about those things, not this one.
Especially in this community. This one is supposed to be a tiny place where people can actually find good things that happened. Every other community apparently is for focusing on the bad stuff. So it’s nice to have one single one that isn’t, just for a break.
If you can’t find a way to avoid pathologically trying to focus everyone’s attention on other bad shit in a rare article about something good, then at the very least it might be a good idea to block the community.
It’s normal to note and even be upset about the bad thing that happened decades ago.
However, when it’s the primary focus of your response to a news article like this - that a bad thing happened decades ago, instead of the actual news that a good thing just happened (and that the bad thing is context and why it might be extra meaningful) - that seems unhealthy.
You might need to talk to someone about potential clinical depression. That doesn’t seem like a healthy takeaway.
It’s nice to see someone who has struggled have good things happen. Potentially nicer to see than a report on someone who hasn’t struggled as much.
Although it’d be nicer if bad things didn’t happen. But they always will to some extent.
It’s nice when things get better.
“Consider”
It’s not time yet, sadly.
Quit “considering” and fucking do it.
God, quit dragging this thing out so that more families get slaughtered.
Good lord.
My impression of Lemmy lately:
<something good happens, gets reported>
Lemmy: that’s cool, but babies get cancer.
Like, come on…
Ooo hey look who’s trying to be edgy. How cute.
They may also not survive as well.
Ia there evidence they will thrive more at higher temperatures? Or are we just trying to find things to be negative about?
I mentioned etc.
It’s the only way.
The way almost everyone else does it - Americans, Europeans, etc - is just wrong.
Because if Russia discovers Omaha is undefended they will send missiles there.
No they won’t.
I mean, I guess I get that you’re saying we should be able to respond rapidly (like, WW2 levels of production) but the ridiculous way you’re framing the point completely, utterly undermines any poi t you’re trying to get across.
That is good news, although I think it should be double that still.
Thanks for this.
And somehow still can barely break even.