Glad someone got it!

….Cherise…

Doubt’ll be the fire of your delight.

I believe it isn’t even easier to use a private DNS or VPN what it’s supposed to be legal on Apple devices.

You’re entitled to your POV but Apple devices (including an Apple TV) can all use private DNS servers. I don’t run a private VPN so I can’t attest to that but of course MacOS can run normal VPN software and custom VPNs. Where are you coming from with this?

What you’re saying is based on the predicate that the system can’t draw concepts it has never seen which is simply untrue. Everything else past that is sophistry.

Edit: also not continuing a conversation with someone who is hostile to the basic rules of logic.

Ok? Hundreds of images of anything isn’t going to necessarily train a model based on billions of images. Have you ever tried to get Stable Diffusion to draw a bow and arrow? Just because it has ever seen something doesn’t mean that it has learned it, nor, more importantly, does that mean that is the way it learned it, since we can see that it can infer many concepts from related concepts- pregnant old women, asian nazis, black george washingtons (NONE OF WHICH actually have ever existed or been photographed)… is unclothed children really more of a leap than any of those?

k

If the system must see something to generate it, and the system can’t generate things that don’t exist, then how is it generating pregnant old women?

The misinformation you’re spreading is related to how it works. A generative AI system will (without prompting away from it) create people with 3 heads, 8 fingers on each hand and multiple legs connecting to each other. Do you think it was trained on that? This argument of “it can generate it, therefore it was trained on it” is ridiculous. You clearly don’t understand how it works.

You’re spreading misinformation and getting called out for it.

Right, and the google image ai gobbled up a bunch of images of black george washington, right? They must have been in the data set, there’s no way to blend a vector from one value to another, like you said. That would be madness. Nope, must have been copious amounts of asian nazis in the training set, since the model is incapable of blending concepts.

You would probably get a kick out of the episode after this.

I tend to think of it as positive synergy but you’re right, it does need a more defined/known term.

The electric company is clearly complicit.

So you’ve got like 9 months to figure this out, but it really didn’t work last time to call everyone who didn’t like the centrist democrat option idiotic. Just history rhyming is all. Let’s try a different rhetoric?

I can’t believe this happened in the country where it happens all the time either

It’s like headline madlibs.

Vladimir _______, Putin _____ found dead after falling from ________ window.

Yeah, he really is breathtaking.

Imagine getting a raise because of the quality of your work and not because if you don’t you can’t afford to live

I guess the “over 40 beautiful girls (and 6 ugly ones)” line was true in this case

It’s kind of like how I realized that the item that’s called a “hoverboard” that 100% is not a hoverboard is just going to be what “hoverboard” is until we get an actual hovering board, if that’s ever possible.