![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
No, they said what they were referring to: AFP saying things without confirmation.
No, they said what they were referring to: AFP saying things without confirmation.
I don’t think you’re gonna have an easy time finding people on Lemmy to defend Russia’s actions in this war.
I think you mean do know nothing.
Or… well, on the ship itself it’s spelled New New, which is a lot saner and funnier than Newnew.
It’s currently the Ameican right, not the American left, defending Israel. And only Americans think “libtard” is a word.
What, even the ones predating locomotives?
Equating Israelis with Jews is, itself, anti-Semitic.
Well, the poster is mostly linguistic prescriptivism (defining what words mean). That small caveat at the bottom that words can mean whatever you want them to can’t really defeat the entire rest of the poster.
Doing that doesn’t teach children to share - it teaches them to avoid getting caught because both the abuser and the victim will be punished, so even as the victim it’s best to keep your abuse private.
“Libertarian conservative” makes exactly as much sense as “authoritarian liberal” and has the same energy as “lawful chaotic” or “evil good”.
Connect lets you subscribe, but right now I am using a mix of Connect, Liftoff, and Jerboa. I think I like Jerboa best so far.
You’re describing criminal cases, OP asked about civil. A civil case has no prosecution, no “charges” per se, and no “sentence” per se (in a civil case you have awarded damages instead).
Topical information often gets buried/harder to find because the algorithms that handle old, highly-upvoted comments are wildly different from the ones handling old, highly-upvoted posts.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen someone support megathreads, only oppose them or be neutral on them (like you).
Regardless of how you’re defining capitalism and socialism, you haven’t changed systems if all you do is change which private entity owns the company.
The Netherlands don’t have freedom of speech, though, so that’s immaterial. The closest thing they have is Article 7, Subarticle 3 in general, which only means they can’t legally be compelled to seek prior approval for speech.