![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
“If you don’t stop committing a humanitarian crisis, we’re going to stop sending humanitarian aid!”
…
What?
“If you don’t stop committing a humanitarian crisis, we’re going to stop sending humanitarian aid!”
…
What?
OP is why we can’t have nice things. Because people will ignore things that should be obvious. So we’re left with everything softball pitched to the lowest common denominator
This is not targeted at you nor OP.
The answer for both you and OP is tied to your last sentence
so we can all enjoy fried chicken and watermelon on Juneteenth.
Why fried chicken and watermelon and why on Juneteenth? Do you eat fried chicken and watermelon as part of your normal rotation? (Hopefully, ‘yes’ because both are delicious and everyone should be afforded the opportunity to indulge)
The issue is that very evidently in both OP’s case and the one you linked that someone was given the prompts “food for celebration” and “celebration of African Americans”, generated “African American party foods”, and churned out a menu reinforcing racist stereotypes. The inquiry is “hey, where is your head at?”
Because most protests are about making the lives of normal people miserable until they’re pissed enough to hold someone to task.
Are the Tories gonna care that Stonehenge was dusted, from in their mansions? Most of them would love to dig up the stones and use them as new countertops, simply as a bragging point at their parties. But normal people that care about landmarks like these will be pissed and, maybe, bitch to the government.
I’m curious how the sentence “There is every reason for people to believe that” gets translated to “sure, you can think that if you want [to be wrong].”
It reads more like, “I can’t say whether it’s ‘1 plus 3’ or ‘2 plus 2’ but everybody is getting 4.” The evidence is all there.
That’s certainly one way to blow someone’s back out
Unless you work with businesspeople. Then both parts are true.
Ah, so it’s more a Mississippi or Alabama
The reply doesn’t even make sense. If you have no more children, then you have no children who can misbehave.
Because an adage isn’t necessarily untrue, like the OP is asking.
I don’t want to take any advice from that kid-beating pet-fucker
When there are no parentheses, you process left to right on the same tier of operations. That’s how it’s always been processed.
Our products are built by only the most discerning 6 year olds we could source. They know quality they will never have the luxury of experiencing for themselves when they see it (from miles away).
“Not trying to incite anything.”
says only incorrect, inflammatory things
profit??? (from being a paid actor to incite discord, because I don’t want to believe an unpaid idiot is posting such horrendously idiotic takes unprompted)
I would’ve thought that we’d all learned that finding people who agree with each other on the internet says nothing about their individual or collective sanity.
I cannot believe Amy is lower level than Fry.
See…I was imagining you’d 3D print the whole thing: paper with text
I get it but, even as a rhetorical, the nice Christians wouldn’t really be the ones making demands, would they?
It’s the same energy because it’s the same joke
Yes, and that would not be currency. It might be useful to think of this as a tiered system.
‘Trade’ is a top-level idea, an exchange between entities. On a tier below that, i.e. a closer specification of ‘trade’, exists ‘barter’ (trading goods for other goods or services) and ‘money’ (trading some representational, notional item for goods/services). ‘Chickens’ as a payment is a further specification of bartering, while ‘currency’ is a further specification of ‘money’ (being ‘money’ defined/in use by a specific power/state).