I’m actually down with banning ads. not for this, but, like, if that’s what gets you on board, I’m so fucking in, let’s do this.
I’m actually down with banning ads. not for this, but, like, if that’s what gets you on board, I’m so fucking in, let’s do this.
is it a sexual urge (which is fine to have) or a thing that is seen as exclusively sexual (which is maybe problematic)?
but what if I dont want people to stare?
then wear a fucking bra/shirt. that’s part of what they’re for. I own several! but also, I don’t always want to wear them, or care. do you understand what a “choice” is?
what about incidental contact
yeah, topless dudes on the train can be annoying. im sure topless women on the train would be almost as annoying. and don’t care! also, have you heard of a “choice”?
undoing oversexualization is hard, so lets just not
shit, okay, you got me. too bad I need to either decide everyone must go topless, or nobody can, and we can’t each choose from day to day. oh well.
uh, no, ocean hag. wearing mostly seaweed and lace.
im actually in favor of charging them for this, and using the most overpriced government contractor you can find, with some absurd conditions about how visible they can be from outside (not at all) etc. maybe add an expensive certification. if their heritage is really that expensive, they can pay out the ass for it.
or, gouge them just the same, and give all the money to the SPLC or something.
also, date each statue was comissioned constructed and finished.
and a reminder of the names of every piece of shit who voted for it. addresses, for the ones who are still alive.
why make them agree?
remind them of an actual civil war hero, and just take them down, killing any CSA fuckers who get in your way?
if we need the materials for anything, or it gets too expensive to keep in a box, sure. lets not give this scrap priority over other scrap.
no, no they’re far worse.
its not that they don’t understand words, it’s that words aren’t communication for them. it’s just checksums. confirming group membership and synchronization. affirming their (percieved) position.
when a character starts being an abolitionist about literal slavery, it becomes a running joke. the goblins are antisemitic stereotypes, up to and including being bankers, and all the characters who aren’t white are named in ways that would have been considered ‘kinda racist’ a century earlier.
I would say this is closer to the japanese version than the german one, since the riots about ‘you are not entitled to rape them, only kill them’ and the governent capitulating.
edit: see: the public competitions about which officers could behead the most chinese VS some german POW’s vomitting or shouting that it had to be lies when they saw video of the death camps. the rhetoric of ‘chopping wood’ used by the nearest moral equivalent to a zionist that has ever existed.
a few who were bought and paid for by a specific (and probably the worst) zionist.
the thing is, as shown here, there are no zionist civilians. not one. they are all armed ready and not just willing but eager to fight.
that isn’t to say there aren’t any sort of resistance, but while they’re not quite partisans yet, friendly fire is not the same as killing civilians.
you’re not making genocide look bad, you’re just making antisemitism look good. fucking stop.
not true! look at all the riots and almost civil war that happened when a judge said maybe you don’t have the right to rape palestinian prisoners!
their orifices and screams are also valued. something something chopping wood.
oh, good thinking, yes; that village was a terrorist.
there are no zionist civilians, holy shit. every time I think they can’t possibly worse, they find a way to surprise me.
fuck your second thought; live on the edge. stare into the abyss.
I mean, the tits thing is a myth. I’ve seen women who were basically flat nurse children, and women with back problems on their chests have trouble. the actual amount of tissue required is very small, or something.