![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
In this case it’s Western Australia.
In this case it’s Western Australia.
Baa Ram Ewe
I think that you need to encabulate more to enhance your phycology
I believe the Taliban supports (at least supported, after of course desecrating them) tourism to these sites, for what it’s worth.
Not that I’m gonna hop on a plane or anything.
And often written in blood
The Rohirrim ride one last time
ITS TOO LATE
Squid could you allow us a little outrage before you set us straight next time?
Linux is not enough, that’s a dated mindset.
Most viruses these days are mobile in nature which gives you a 50% shot of which *nix you’re on. You’re either on a Unix like os based on MacOS or heavily modified Linux kernel.
“half” of the political interest in this nation would have preferred to not give Ukraine a penny and allow Russia to take what they want.
Right now there is a very real risk that the USA will stop coming to their aid. I am ASHAMED as a US citizen that right now we’re hemming and hawing about getting involved.
My entire fucking life has been war on foreign soil and NOW when we have a chance to be the honest to god fucking good guys and half of the nation would rather restrict human rights then defend them, it’s sickening.
Let me get this straight.
After the Republican Party, largely led by Trump, have stymied aid to Ukraine and generally been pro Russia.
The motherfucker was for all intents and purposes outed as a Russian asset during congressional hearings.
Now Trump makes a politically pragmatic statement (backed up by no action or calls for his party to turn and support Ukraine) and suddenly we’re supposed to think he’s on their side?
Neuromancer you have got to be one of the dumbest motherfuckers to exist if you think you’re fooling anyone.
My dude the training and arming of Ukraine by NATO started happening before Trump came into office.
Trump tried blocking the Javelins in 2018. He wasn’t for it. He was convinced ultimately to follow longstanding US foreign policy that started before he got there.
Yes he approved it. 1 scenario where he got out of the way. Neat.
What’s his stance been since? And before?
What’s even wilder is your comment is 100% true.
The issue has and always will be that Medicare for all takes money away from the billionaire class.
Privatization is the reason for “small government”
They got theirs and that’s all that matters, now stop being poor in their general direction.
It does actually claim that.
You just have to read.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572548/table/T1/?report=objectonly
My claim is most people will pay less, my claim has been that from the beginning.
The study I linked makes that argument.
There are countless others.
AFTER the article makes mention of government revenue increase it then informs how that increase in taxes revenue would result in a net decrease for the actual average person.
Your taxes might go up more than you pay into your health plan and it’s telling that you can’t see past your own nose to the point.
The Abstract ALONE claims the opposite.
You’re using words hoping people will believe you because you’re saying them like an asshole talking down to children.
To your “lower pay” point that’s not necessarily true and the article explains the how.
The savings to providers alone would be double the “decrease” in pay, again pay would only go down through a grift.
I cited nothing.
I quoted the word because you used it incorrectly in a myriad of ways.
Here’s one, it’s not by their campaign so maybe you might be able to throw that bias of yours out.
Sorry it came from Lancet and not Cato. These studies are literally EVERYWHERE it’s honestly hard work to truly believe what you do.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572548/
^ the article was published in Lancet.
China is really refining capitalism into its own new monster.
Idk who’s capitalism monster scares me the most now.