![](https://midwest.social/pictrs/image/c158ea8d-38d4-40ca-9959-15c39573dc56.webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
Yes. But generally it takes long-term constant exposure to the thing they think they hate. In order to override the indoctrinated or programmed in misconceptions.
Yes. But generally it takes long-term constant exposure to the thing they think they hate. In order to override the indoctrinated or programmed in misconceptions.
No it isn’t. Naturel conservationism is about conserving nature political social conservationism often generally just shortened to conservatism is about conserving and preserving political and social power. Nothing more nothing less they are identical just about different topics.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz still exists and is a Democrat. And I think another thing people have issue with. Is that while it’s understandable that Sinema and Manchin exist and are horrible. Democrats seem to most often use that as an excuse to not even try. Republicans try and thankfully often fail to do horrible things. But they try. It’s one thing to say you support X. It’s another to be seen trying to support it. Democrats talk the talk, but most can’t walk.
Germans making excuses to hate innocent people. You making excuses to hate innocent people. How is a different?