You really went out on a lamb with that pun.
You really went out on a lamb with that pun.
My favorite!
If we survive 20 years I’ll see to it personally that we’ll consider the matter.
You must be trolling because Eskimos aren’t imaginary. I use their tax software every year when I go to file my return.
Probably pretty shitty.
Man I knew I shouldn’t have thrown all my old babies out.
Thanks I hate it.
Sorry but having nuclear weapons and ‘other technology’ doesn’t make a nation a super power. Outside of the cyber and disinformation realm they can barely exert influence outside of their own borders. You could even make the argument that they don’t even have complete control within their own borders as they have been unable to prevent attacks from occurring internally within their controlled territory.
A super power has complete sovereignty over their territories and global influence across multiple domains of which very very few countries could be considered to have that. Russia can barely project their power against what should have been a much weaker adversary. Also before you spout off some nonsense about the US/NATO arming Ukraine and unfairly tipping the scales… If Russia were a true superpower they would not only have the military ability to project their power but they could also use their soft power in building a coalition of nations to accomplish their goals. They have failed to do either at this point.
Russia isn’t a super power.
It’s where they plan to install their new screen doors.
Yup, blown up meant that parts of it were airborne, so like an aircraft.
Of course.
The Moskva was sunk and the submarine was blown up while in dry dock.
The smoke was all over the eastern US too.
As long as he is provided a chair to sit in he should be fine with it.
I know several humans and none of them are FontMasterFlex. They must be a bot.
So what is it Neo? The blue suppository or the red suppository?
Which is why I said a more accurate sentence would be most industrialized nations have awful climate impact. Diluting their impact behind a per capita graph is misleading. Also out of all my travels in the world China has been the only country I could visibly see that impact without having traveled to it or even being super close. The morning chemical smog I’d see in Korea on a regular basis compares to nothing else I’ve seen and I’ve lived in some pretty dirty regions.
How is it not true? Per capital they are lower but that doesn’t mean much when you have over a billion people. I think a more accurate sentence would be most industrialized nations have awful awful climate impacts.
Heh infrastructure from 150 years ago is vastly different than infrastructure today. 150 years ago you didn’t have buried electricity lines, telecom lines and fiber, robust water and sewage solutions. Those things need regular service and replacement. If your population goes down that means your revenue to pay for those things go down as well.