- 0 Posts
- 27 Comments
51·4 months agodeleted by creator
Or how about, rather than your narrow, specific 3 definitions, a fourth thing, such as how it’s phrased in the wiki:
Misogyny is hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against women or girls. It is a form of sexism that can keep women at a lower social status than men.
The emphasis there is why you’re being called names on the internet. If you’re advocating systems or societal norms of gender oppression, you’re being misogynist. This remains true even if you’re not doing it intentionally.
The world we live in is deeply patriarchal, so it can be hard to see these problems, because the views and opinions you’ve got are just “normal”. Something being the norm doesn’t mean it isn’t oppressive, and having an opinion doesn’t mean you shouldn’t consider the impacts of that opinion.
Generally, if someone calls you a misogynist, and you go “bUt I rEsPeCt wOmEn”, you might want to take a little time to figure out where it’s coming from. It can certainly be real without fitting in your 3 tidy little self-serving definitions.
I’ll also point out that you can replace nearly every instance of misogyny in this thread with racism, and replace women with black, and it would be the same discussion. Or you could swap misogyny/women with misandry/men. Oppression is oppression, no matter who holds the power.
It means if you search for anything, your first 3 pages of hits are the same useless websites that exist to push ads vaguely related to your search rather than real info. Trying to research a broken TV used to return things like AVForums or reddit threads or samsung support sites. Now it’s “TEN BEST TV’s IN 2024” that are nothing but sponsored content and affiliate links to tvs on amazon.
Google can’t figure out how to tell the difference between the former and the latter, and isn’t motivated to because they get paid for the ad clicks, and not for the forum clicks.
2·5 months agoFair enough, just seems like a lot of work vs. 2 clicks on the filters.
You don’t need to ground your Shelly if the circuit is otherwise properly grounded. The Shelly will fail open if something internal shorts.
Per the rest of the discussion re: hot wire loops to switches with no neutral or ground, just put the Shelly into the upstream junction box. (Wherever the switch wire branches from the circuit. Usually that’s where the light is.)
… Why? They exist for a reason, the interface has filter and sort options.
Specifically: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B095KSZQGD?psc=1
And
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0BCHBXZ8D?psc=1
And several of the a19 and br30 models.
If you scroll to the Phillips hue list on ZigBee.blackadder.com, you’ll see the lack of ZHA support.
ZHA isn’t compatible with a lot of recent Hue bulbs. It’s a bit frustrating.
deleted by creator
Would be real nice if the blackadder list somehow flagged devices that are no longer available.
Here you go. Will do specifically what you want, including Web hooks and MQTT out of the box. The Shelly cloud is fine, but these are flashable with tasmota or esphome or roll your own firmware.
OP asks for “lowest latency” but HTTP is fast enough, and later in the thread says “perceptibly instant” is the goal. HTTP is going to be your slowest option, almost certainly, but even the slowest solution is “instant”.
What exactly are you trying to do, OP?
(Esphome seems like the answer you’re looking for. It’s faster than MQTT and you can program parts of the automation and service management in the ESP hardware. RF is probably the only way to go faster.)
Yeah, lesson learned there, but to OP’s point, nothing ever seems to just work.
Fun part in my case is that the specific bulb I want doesn’t have a ZHA-compatible counterpart. (Hue a19 white& color 1100. The 800 isn’t bright enough.)
deleted by creator