“Czechoslovakia is not my problem” vibes. How did that end up?

So having western troops in Ukraine should also be fine if they stop at the russian border right?

More like democracy good, but justice is not a popularity contest.

In a well run country that requires a supermajority of some kind of council picked by different groups like some representatives for the judges, others picked by the legislature, etc. which avoids any group having full control of the courts.

It’s not capitalism it’s the forced work. People hated Mondays in the Soviet Union too.

completely ignores all the vote buying, voters threats and propaganda done by a fascist regime in Russia because the world is clearly a black and white Hollywood movie, while posting leftist posts

Your imbecilic idiologic forefathers that were sucking Hitler’s dick when he invaded Poland in 1939 would be proud of you.

They are both bisexual.

Communist Party of Zhōngguó

Fixed that for you.

That’s why decent rulers have a 0 and a margin:

Your rulers start at 1? That sounds annoying.

How long until Belarus asks NATO for air defense?

3 lawyers and 1 teacher (who can only afford a corner in the kitchen) as roommates.

For desktop you probably can use something like https://github.com/TCB13/LoFloccus/ to save the bookmarks to a file in Synchthing. (Disclaimer: I haven’t tried this myself)

China’s final warning == Russia’s final warning == Biden’s final warning.

The only reason I see to take this even half seriously is because Biden doesn’t have anything left to lose.

Let it stand. If ads are an integral part of the work and its message, let’s make the website owners fully legally responsible for the content of every single ad they display. If any ad contains malware or is a scam let’s throw the C-suite in jail for it.

That would solve most of the issues with ads really fast.

The little Trump says about it shows he wants to run external affairs and defense as the world’s biggest protection racket.

One thing is allowing the other is actively collecting and processing the data.

Also no. But 2 wrongs don’t make a right.

You are speaking like there are only two alternatives and none of them involves following the law.

Firefox creates a report based on what the website asks, but does not give the result to the website. Instead, Firefox encrypts the report and anonymously submits it using the Distributed Aggregation Protocol (DAP) to an “aggregation service”.

Mozilla can’t send user data to an “aggregation service” without explicit consent, no matter how much propaganda they use to explain it.

Why is Mozilla coming from the position that what advertisers want is reasonable or acceptable in any shape or form? The advertisement industry existed for centuries without the ability to spy on people and they were doing just fine.

Edit: this being opt-out instead of opt-in also violates the GDPR.