Yes! Web of trust is the only way. Everything else can be scammed. I am kinda wondering if it could be invites and if severing could be automated for social media. “We just banned a third person who came in on your invitations. Goodbye.”

That’s what it has been like for years now.

I mean, this is a win-win. Unfortunately the people who have purchased our politicians probably won’t see it that way.

Donald and his Trumpanzee cult are the giant domino, it is crushing us alongside the conservatives who pushed the smallest one.

I saw them give trillions of free dollars to companies that had just received three years of extremely vigorous tax cuts.

Why would you want a simulation version? You will get saved at “well rested.” It will be an infinite loop of put to work for several hours and then deleted. You won’t even experience that much, your consciousness is gone.

With the subscription they can focus on the Pareto optimization. 20% of the subscribers will be causing 80% of the entitled asshattery. Drop those, focus on features, raise prices, keep the good contracts. This software looks like a good fit for enterprise spending tens of thousands to get a support contract.

It sounds like the repo is still up and open and they just aren’t going to deal with unpaid work packaging it up and managing idiots whining about it? Good for them, I honestly don’t have any complaints with this.

You can certainly make such a license but I think it will hinder adoption. Just do a paid license at that point and refuse to renew if someone makes you mad enough.

I disagree that it should be allowed, but I think their proposal would be something like attaching an identifier to the model, the random seed, the “temperature,” and any other relevant parameters that allow exact reproduction of the image without having access to anything but the model. Then you can prove it came from the model.

Here’s a thought experiment, though, what would prevent someone from taking a real image and a model, then working with them until they can reproduce a very close approximation of the real image from text and parameter input? These models aren’t like a hash function, they can be viewed in reverse to some extent. Backpropagation is how they are trained.

The link explains that they are in a dataset used to train a text-to-image model. Images with hashes matching known CSAM. There are tools that could have caught this which this dataset failed to use. Gigantic and repugnant failure. Makes me want to never download a dataset.

But then we cannot say that in either direction. We simply don’t know if they are more or less likely to attack a child without data about it.

I thought pedophiles looking at CSAM were more likely to attack a child, not less. They are actively fantasizing about it, and that can escalate.

I am basing this belief on what I remember of discussions regarding that “ask a rapist” reddit megathread. Apparently psychologists thought that was horrifying.

The person in the article who apparently viewed it multiple times over a long period of time absolutely did so deliberately.

I think the point in sending you the image was to show that, in general, it is possible for images to be present on your computer without you actively attempting to access them. Not to say that the argument was valid in this particular case.

Your input isn’t represented? Uh oh, sounds like you are being silenced and persecuted!

It is, probably.

But it won’t be written over with zeros, so it’s all still there until something else actually writes over it. A mobile device is flash memory, so the controller wear leveling might not get back to that spot for a bit. It might decide that spot is a bad sector and never write over it.

You transitioned into panicking that cishet white Christians are being persecuted because there is a sub for US news and a different sub for other news, but it is the other people’s hyperbole that is wrong, got it.

It seems like there is a step in between, like, “America is the victim of injustice because it isn’t given priority status in the world news sub that has to be distinct because all the other news subs end up being about America.” Some sort of persecution complex?

Every off-the-rack suit is for some average body which doesn’t seem to exist. I’ve never had a jacket fit shoulder, chest, and arm length.

I can choose to look like a child in his father’s jacket, a child who has grown out of his own jacket, or pay a few thousand (?) for something that actually fits.

It’s not a large sum at all. That’s one of the most shameful facts of all these corrupt shitheads. They sell their countries out for such a pittance.

That looks like the Monero logo to me. So I think it is a parody of “molon labe” referencing money instead of weapons.