paywall that finances both creation and the providing material.
Finance creation? It promotes lazy copycat contents. Even respectful (at least before their YouTube career) tech/artisan/DIYers etc are falling for the clickbait, the YouTube’s basic/teen humor… I pass on the tabloid stuff.
You want to make views. use these keywords:
The thing is that platform is just a TV.
I guess content creators should also pay for their access on the platform, not just a cut on the revenue. it will enforce good/honest creation .
Don’t want to be pedantic but you don’t “own” children, you are parent.
When you think about it, we have so few “season” to experience in a human life, a max of farming knowledge must be shared and available to all.
Adobe because Adobe tells them Firefox isn’t supported.
And why? It has nothing to do with Firefox. So here, You are not using Chrome for its pretending superiority, you use it because of sabotage.
Don’t get me wrong, you are totally free to do whatever you want, pal.
it baffles me that people are still using Google Chrome.
Thank you, but I was talking about heat generated by the fires and compound build-up (eg: co2), while the last one might bring its effects later.
Just to be sure, I talk about these figures, not the global climate deregulation.
Couldn’t the massive fires (energy and compounds generated) exacerbate these values?
Don’t make me say what I didn’t say.
GIMP for sure.
Why do you think there’s always a comment summarizing video being little 'bailty, because it is a freaking waste of time. 5sec comment summarize a 12min! If summary is engaging, I would watch the video but most of the time, I don’t.
yes, sorry youtuber that you have invested 5000$ in this streamer gig and you copy-cat ikea-youtube-room