![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/c0ed0a36-2496-4b4d-ac77-7d2fd7f2b5b7.png)
N is the number elements to be parsed by the function
Reddit refugee looking for a better alternative.
N is the number elements to be parsed by the function
n = 1 and you have O(1)
Hadn’t thought of that!
It has bridges for most messaging services so you could use a matrix frontend for most of your messaging needs without having people on matrix so long as the server admin has set up those extensions
Using K-9 and quite liking it, otherwise just browse F-droid everything there is Foss.
I might swap bitwarden by passbolt as it uses a more recent programming stack, although vaultwarden looks to be a good alternative too.
For sure! Yeah I was just remembering that shares get mounted as a drive when you access them. So makes sense.
Maybe! I’d start checking dmesg logs and check the smart info provided you do regular tests. Otherwise do some SMART tests and check the results after.
could try finding a cheap jbod
It’s neither, it’s a limitation of SMB, if you have multiple shares set-up that mount to the root of the SMB share, you can’t hardlink accross them, but inside a single share in the root of the SMB share apparently it’s not an issue.
Sure *are apps might not have a way of knowing but they are still limited by SMB’s limitations. If you’re sharing individual folders you simply can’t hardlink across them. But my bad for thinking SMB didn’t allow hardlink inside the same share mount point.
I think more the randomness aspect of it, comments people requesting accesses, accounts being created all around, etc…
CIFS is SMB under a diferent name, and it might be that inside a share you can hardlink, but not across shares in the same filesystem.
Are you sharing the top folder holding both folders where you’re creating the hardlinks or are you creating individual shares for each folder?
Check you ISP connections limits, remember that uploading from an external device will be downloaded by your home router and vice versa.
one caveat is the need for *rr apps to have direct access to the storage filesystem, and not connect through some filesharing protocol (smb, NFS, etc…) afaik. ISCSI might be good since it’s presented as an actual system drive, speculating.
Well if the app is actively maintained the code is checked every time someone makes a push request to the main code base. You still have to trust the managers of the repository (code base) to verify every push request thoroughly, however, it’s in the best interest of the repository managers to do so to maintain trust in the project and it’s users.
Love Ben Eater and his projects. Helped me understand lots about how a computer functions under the hood with his 8bit computer project.
True that!