I suppose it’s “confusing perspective” worthy.

Then I hope it won’t get any traction.

I hope this is a joke and not intended to be real.

Done airlines give you outside views, but shoot with potatoes. So it’s better not having that. Also there is nothing to see at most of the cruise height.

I want to see the 10x hamsters!

I had no idea! Thank you for the great explanation.

West-sex wessex
South-sex sussex
East-sex essex but no
North-sex Nossex?

Shots fired! Shots fired!

Ok so what is that mean? I am not familiar with the slang at all? Also I suppose I need to point out I am not native too.

It is, but If you review 3 lines of pr and not the whole 50 lines of the file without thinking of the overall picture, this happens. I got this while reviewing a pr like this. And most probably I approved similar prs for this file in the past. Shame on me too…

Yep that’s on me:) let’s call this second breakfast!

It’s not the real issue. I introduced that while anonymizing the data. It’s that a 3-5 liner code became a huge switch case by just incrementing the code and never thinking how it should be done. This was caused by like 15 engineers in time :)

Something like below would be huge improvement:

subs1 = ["cluster1", "cluster2"]
if subs1.contains(clusterName) return subs1

And no reason to state this is from production.

no one looks behind and questions how and why.

it was never an array to begin with!

Oh I feel old already. I even forgot about this.

this looks cool. Particularly this rectangular screen is great.

is prowlarr better than jackett? Is it wise to invest some time to migrate?