classic

I figure if it’s open source someone will have read the code and I can settle for riding that effort

It’s the right answer if you know how to read code

You know, I can go with that. I was just reflecting how her response to all this is a beacon of light in what is otherwise an absolutely grim, disgusting event.

Apparently a lot of other peeps in the comments are continually leaking from their orifices or something

That’s line’s got some oomph to it

What is scene music?

Protestors threw rainbow confetti on the neo-nazis

Way more of this please

wtf. You’d think that’s be the end of his candidacy

Are there currently any viable examples of this out there? “Viable” in this case meaning you can find stuff on there and it’s easy to set up, I guess

Kindred spirits! I log ‘to check out’ lists and call it a day

That bit was regarding why they wouldn’t do the same thing regarding one’s father

Personally I think it’d be a power move to say I fucked you’re dad

The whatever reason bring that they’d have played themselves because homophobia.

I imagine the potency of yo mama jokes that focus on banging her, as opposed to accentuating how ugly she is, comes from the discomfort of sexualizing someone that you want to not have sexualized given your intimacy with her. Reframing your mom as a sexual being rewrites the experience of affection with her, for example.

The ugliness piece devalues someone precious to you.

I also thinks it’s just a rules of the game that people decide on and then forget. Participating in a game about who will gets upset, everyone implicitly agrees that this is something they can fall prey to having a reaction about. Sort of social game theory

I make a peanut butter concoction subbing a whole grain like spelt for the bread and using pb that is just peanuts. Would that be considered any better?

The thing is we could largely retain all our advances and live in a more fecund environment. A large portion of our pollution is unnecessary and tied to whatever you call this global economic system / social paradigm we’ve backed ourselves into. It’s only either or between forest and urban blight because we’ve made it so

tbh, I mostly don’t look at anyone’s profile. I just meet each comment on its own

I think I read this comment with a different tone than others…

I hear you on the resources needed for computers being scarcer. But this might still fall overall under human induced scarcity. If we lived in more communal ways, the whole approach to personal computers could change, for instance, in a way that increased access in a more sustainable way. In no way do I believe that will happen, ofc. Just as we’re not likely going to go from every household owning one or more televisions to having, say, a shared theater in every neighborhood

There is definitely human induced scarcity. I debated including that distinction.

I appreciate the analogy

Going back far enough, scarcity is the answer. We technically live in a post-scarcity world now. But we are bound by the models we developed when it existed.