I also wish they’d worded it in a way where it’d be illegal for women to marry children too, just to cover all bases.

Still is in California, Mississippi, New Mexico, and Oklahoma …

He’s suggesting balancing the content. If all you read is terrible, outrage inducing news, yes, you’re life is far worse off. It’s outside our your sphere of influence and reading the same news for the third time won’t make you more informed.

The only thing it will do is make you feel angry, helpless, and less understanding of nuance. Keep it going for longer enough and, congratulations, you’ve radicalized yourself.

Also known as an echo chamber.

Not all algorithms are AI

Come on guys, you’re all falling for obvious bait.

The law does not universally require “intent”, I might not intend to speed in my car or fuck a 17 year old, but if it happens I am still responsible.

Well, if you bothered reading into the second paragraph, you’d have more info:

UniSuper had a backup account with another cloud provider, and service was restored May 2.

So Google doesn’t keep (unpaid) backups for it’s clients, and the ones UniSuper paid for were deleted along with everything else.

Sorry, it’s only possible in a FOSS client, they’re way better…

I’m really loving the high-quality, modern journalism technique of checks notes basing an article entirely on what random people have said on social media.

So pronounced phone-tick?

Either you misunderstand or the person you are responding to is. If you retroactively add a license to the current state of the code (for example by committing a new LICENSE file and adding the new license to the top of each file), or course that applies to the entire state of that code as of that commit. What is more difficult is that earlier commits won’t have that license explicitly unless you rewrite git history to make that happen (which is possible but tedious).

You can always relicense code you own the rights to. You can even dual license it, or continue to use it commercially in terms contradicting the license you open sourced it as, as long as you have the permission of every contributor.

The idea that a license added would only apply to code added after the license change is very funny.

You may be a perfectionist who’s so afraid of failure that it currently (rationally or irrationally) outweighs the motivation to succeed by a significant margin. You’d like to do some bigger things in life but you self-sabotage by distracting yourself because the thought of actually doing things is way too scary / stressful.

Is that fucking loss? I stg…

That’s not what using proprietary code means in this case.

Besides, it’s possible they “legitimately” bought a copy of the game from a store that accidentally broke the embargo date. You can’t legally blame customers for that.

Torrents are usually not downloaded in order but (for all intents and purposes) randomly. That means that, even though 10% might already be downloaded, it might just be the final 10% of the movie (or more realistically, random snippets scattered throughout the file).

There used to be some torrent clients that were able to do what you ask, request pieces in order only, but I don’t know if they are still around and they could potentially affect your download speed.

The problem was that one of his friends was connected to the airport’s public Wi-Fi, so the photo ended up with British intelligence.

This doesn’t make sense at all, it all goes over encrypted connections, the airport’s wifi doesn’t act as a hoover for data, they can’t decrypt it without the private keys. Muuuuch more likely is that Snapchat cooperates with Five Eye’s intelligence, apparently screening private chats for key phrases and forwarding them on to governments.

It’s the beauty of the fediverse

It could be called a dark pattern?

What language is that?