so you are the degenerate that follow world news on lemmynsfw. I was wondering why are there so many news on the all feeds of my porn account.
so you are the degenerate that follow world news on lemmynsfw. I was wondering why are there so many news on the all feeds of my porn account.
Apologists for Chinese/Russian government.
deleted by creator
I have figured out the problem. Turns out although in ip a
, the MAC is the same, yet in the vm, the MAC is different.
As for being assigned the same IP, it is just my stupid router… Getting a new MAC (creating a new VM) fixes the issue.
Sorry, a stupid question.
If the bridge is the primary interface on host, and the homeassistant KVM also uses this bridge, will this cause them to get the same IP again?
Thank you for your patience.
Thank you for the configuration. I wonder, because you have turn dhcp off for the host, will this prevent the host from getting an ip address?
Two of the same MAC address can’t exist in the same IP space, else the router can’t route packets to them.
Yes, this seems to be my problem, both the host and the vm got the same IP, and I think I cannot send any traffic to either my host or vm. So my router is probably confused, as you suggested.
Is there an issue with using Docker for this?
I forgot to mention this, docker indeed work. However, ha requires a privileged docker running as root, which means ha essentially runs as root on the host.
This is fine on dedicated hardware, but as my server have other infrastructure on there, running ha as root can be a security risk.
Hi, thank you for your reply.
Did you make sure that eno2 is enslaved by br0? When br0 is created, it indeed have a unique MAC, but once it enslaves the hardware, it inherits the hardware address.
I have not tried to get the bridge going with virsh, but I was unsuccessful with the virt-manager ui. And I assume they use the same system?
It is possible I have accidentally disabled some network virtualization kernel component during setup, as I have implemented some mods from secureblue. I will try to reset everything to default, and try again.
Do you have a tutorial for making bridge via virsh that you can share.
And this is the real game of monopoly, of course.
since most western outlets are causally dismissive of the claims.
It is interesting you didn’t give any western media the benefit of the doubt, while giving CCP plenty.
After a quick google search, it seems like there are several court documents for Zhang’s case circling the internet:
There are two different versions, one judgement, one indictment (copy). Their contents seems to match, and they also match the reports of various media articles.
The indictment mentioned neither “the lie” nor “the truth”, which, in my mind, is probably why most media never reported it.
The document only mentioned:
故根据现查明的事实可以证实 张展通过微信、“twitter”(推特)、“YouTube”(油管)等网络媒介发布的相关文章、视频及接 受采访内容均与武汉市实际防控疫情的客观实际情况不符。
according to current known fact, the related article, videos, and interview by Zhang Zhan on wechat, twitter, youtube, differ from the objective truth of situations in Wuhan.
I was not able to find any court document from official source from China/CCP. Since all these articles are either photos or transcribed from photo, I don’t imagine the original documents are easy to find. It seems like the original document can be obtained from: https://wenshu.court.gov.cn/ (according to the title of the website, and Chinese government owned domain name), but they require personally identifiable information (like phone number, which is connected to ID in China) after I typed in 张展 (Zhang Zhan).
But since you clearly know more about China and CCP than I do, so you might want to give it a try.
According to https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/arrest, “arrest” means
If the police arrest someone, they take them away to ask them about a crime that they might have committed
And in https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arrest
to take or keep in custody by authority of law
Dr. Li was taken to police station because the police has deemed his action is against the law.
He was later released because he signed a consent about “stop spreading misinformation”, which I showed in my response. We wouldn’t know how he will be treated if he refuse to sign such consent. But I might hypothesize that the police wouldn’t simply let him go.
And he has never spread any misinformation, the patient record he sent to his friend clearly indicated the patient has tested positive for SARS; and as we know later, the disease is indeed caused by SARS-cov2.
Yeah, the final ECMO was indeed controversial in Chinese community. Other than that, I have not heard any indication of mistreatment.
Given his high social status, and he said “一个健康的社会不该只有一种声音” (a healthy society shouldn’t only have only one voice), some people suspect CCP likely wanted him dead. But so far, I am not aware of any evidence that his death is man-made.
You know who else was arrested for “spreading misinformation”? The doctor who tried to warn his friends about covid privately, before the government took any action.
Source (in chinese): https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/chinese-news-51371586
The form he filled out at police station, clearly stating his action is against the law:
couple related articles in english:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Wenliang
I don’t think he isn’t properly treated, at least according to wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li_Wenliang#Illness_and_death
There is a bench in New York central park dedicated to him: https://www.westsiderag.com/2023/02/07/central-park-bench-and-gathering-honor-covid-19-whistleblower . If you are near the central park, you can stop by to pay tribute to him.
I think this is just 表弟 (younger male cousin). 老表 is too casual to be used as a tag in phone book.
Chinese government are turning a blind eye on companies, but not on individuals, this is the primary evidence of state-sponsored capitalism.
Right on the front page of 996.icu, Chinese government are willing to prosecute a individual for the use of VPN for work, and confiscated all their income for the duration of their use of VPN (3 years, 1058k rmb, roughly 146k USD, which is more than most people’s life savings), with some additional fine.
Imaging if CCP seek to bankrupt every single company that disobey the law in the same manner, then 996 would never ever exists.
Maybe you can educate me on this, is there any prosecution that fine a company the entirety of its revenue during the 996 policy period?
Is it possible to share your source on “Every instance of someone taking a company to court over 996 has resulted in them winning.”?
It is definitely protest. But they choose these outfit to protest because they are comfortable, as oppose to vampires costume, which would also violate the dress code.
This is related to what OP is saying. These outfit already exists because of toxic work culture, they are taking it to the extreme.
I want to say “live to see another day”, but on retrospect, that is indeed, quite boring.