• 0 Posts
  • 89 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle


  • Almost all of the Christian folklore surrounding Jesus can be directly tied to other myths that were common knowledge to Mediterranean people at the time.

    There was a dude called Jesus, there were a lot of them. That one was Jewish and belonged to an evangelical cult was likely. But we can’t really say that because the Bible exists so too must have the Jesus described within.

    What we have today was written by people hundreds of years after the fact. There was nothing written during these events, nothing at least that survived.

    If you go looking for proof of Jesus, you’ll either come out disappointed, or delusional. Think of guys like Ken Ham.

    Keep the faith, by all means. But part of believing is accepting that you don’t get to have proof.






  • It still works in highly technical areas.

    Or if you’re a machinist someone will tell you the right way to do something as soon as they see you have the material. By the time you have it in the machine 6 other guys will have told you the right way to do it in six wildly different ways. Someone will suggest Vaseline instead of coolant. Someone will start bitching about Haas. Someone will insist that it’s only possible with thru spindle coolant, regardless of depth. None of which matters because your code won’t post to the 40 year old 3 axis mill you’re using and the engineer gave you a print with impossible geometry anyway. GEE I DON’T KNOW TERRY DO YOU THINK THIS HUNK OF STEEL LOOKS LIKE YOUR PART YET

    Anyway my point is sometimes there’s more than one right answer, even if everyone says they have the one right answer.

    Sometimes technical specifications limit you to a specific set of right answers, but the right answers you get are for different set ups entirely.

    and sometimes, the circumstances surrounding your failure were given to you by the engineer in a state that was destined to fail, whether they knew it or not.











  • Here’s the problem, it doesn’t matter if it was or not. It does, but that’s a different issue.

    My point is, how do you know it wasn’t trained on csam?

    You can’t possibly. You can point to all the places where csam isn’t and say “we haven’t found any illegal images yet.” But you can’t say with 100% certainty that there are none.

    And since you can’t prove that no csam is used to train the model, any argument beyond that point is moot. If this were almost any other issue I’d say eliminating 99.99% of the risk is completely valid and safe. But we’re not talking about a celebrity or a porn star. We’re talking about child victims of sexual assault, and to that end we should not accept anything other than absolute certainty. And because absolute certainty cannot exist, we should not simply accept it as a society.