Why did you respond to a question yet refuse to answer the question?
Why did you respond to a question yet refuse to answer the question?
…so you would be against the Native Americans of the US and Canada being given their homeland back?
Well, Germany was split in two after the war, and most Jews who survived the holocaust weren’t German Jews, so if we were to send all of European Jews to West Germany, you are still having to deal woth the displacement aspect that you are currently using to build a case for genocide.
I’m also going to set aside your childish accusations of racism, because it isn’t true. You willingly chose to enter a discussion, the bare minimum is mutual respect and if you can’t accomplish that, there will be no discussion going forward. As for the Romani people, the Romania’s homeland wasn’t still under British rule, and thus couldn’t offer to have them go back India. I’m not even sure the Romani people wanted to return to India. Is that something they were pushing for or are you just making a hypothetical?
What are you suggesting should have been done with the Jewish survivors if returning to their homeland itself is unacceptable to you?
Where else were the survivors of the holocaust credibly being offered the establishment of their own government beside their actual homeland?
The end goal of a Jewish homeland has always been genocide of Arabs?
I suspect that isn’t true but am willing to read whatever you are basing this claim off of.
Okay, but the US isn’t bound by the ICC, and the ICC went with articles 7 and 8 against Netanyahu, not article 6.
What is taken out of context when he says that people have every reason to believe Netanyahu is prolonging the war, and then goes on yo say Netanyahu is unhelpful and that he no longer cares whether Netanyahu can change his mind?
He is clearly telling the Likkud to call an election.
Or are you taking offense at the idea that Hamas is responsible for this war? They are.
Biden essentially just told the world the US has no faith in Netanyahu leadership, which is essentially telling the Likkud to disband and form a new coalition government.
I get that you guys are demanding he use a word that the ICC has refused to use, but he is laying the groundwork yo accomplish an end to this but it doesn’t fit your narrative.
I believe the ICC chose not to seek charges for article 6, instead opting for article 7 and 8.
The ICC itself is not seeking to try him for genocide.
If the only credible path you get to choose is 30 something thousand civilian casualties, or complete annihilation of those civilians, not choosing the prevention of complete annihilation places a moral fault on you.
I am sorry, I didn’t realize I was incorrect that Qatar and Iran are funding Hamas. I think you started the baby talk a little too early to convince me otherwise.
Your goo goo gaga speak is adorable though. I have no doubt you will find somebody who has that for a kink.
You’re and we’re, but otherwise that was a correct sentence.
That doesn’t even make sense as a bullying attempt.
Lol, I don’t support Israel in this conflict.
Where specifically in the article does it say that Israel is fully funding Hamas and Qatar and Iran aren’t?
Putting more knowledge in a box isn’t going to create a lifeform. I have even listened to Sam Altman state they are not going to get a life form from just pretraining, though they are going to continue making advances there until the next breakthrough comes along.
Rest assured, as an AI doomsayer myself, I promise you they are nowhere close to sentience.