It didn’t, I just disagree.

Nice, I do like it when useful idiots identifiy rhemselves upfront, instead of me having to dig, thanks!

Who is “calling” and “not calling” the uncommitted movement?

Don’t sell yourself short. You are an ally, you are helping. Just not the side you think you are.

And just like your fellow regressives, you desperately reject reality until it personally affects you.

I just hope that when it does, it isn’t someone else who pays that price for you.

Have a good day.

I didn’t, but only through luck. If we weren’t lucky, I would have had to kill them, or more likely I would have had to try to.

Apparently since I don’t approve of killing people I have to list all the incountable ways that you can deal with all kinds of negative confrontations without resorting to literally killing someone.

Please, do tell me how I could have managed to deal with multiple drunk guys cornering and trying to beat/stab us to death.

This has been a very stupid day defending the most basic idea that maybe we shouldn’t just kill people and maybe we shouldn’t fantasize about killing people.

I think what’s even more stupid, is coming into a community of vulnerable people, and telling them that by defending themselves from aggressors makes them bad people, that they’ll have blood on their hands and they won’t be able to live with themselves.

I honestly think you’re either one of two things: You’re either an alt right troll, or worse, you’re someone who thinks themselves an ally, but has absolutely zero practical experience in the matter.

I mean anyone who says the following:

If self defense was really the goal why didn’t the father gift their child a bullet proof vest or a shield or pepper spray or a taser or any other of the myriad options that exist in the real world to defend yourself from attackers?

Is either trolling, or unintentionally trying to get people killed through bad advice.

Either way, you’re helping the regressives, not us.

If in the act of defending yourself, you kill somebody, is that objectively a good righteous thing? Is that not a bloody stain on the world? Will there not be blood on your hands?

What is your alternative then? Let’s hear it.

If some transphobe/homophobe/racist/etc corners me and my family/friends (again), what should I do according to you? I’m curious.

So you’re still homophobic?

This is a PR move, don’t fall for it.

Quotes from the man himself, on how much he actually supports marriage equality and LGBTQ peolle:

“I cannot hide my concern for the family, which is threatened, perhaps as never before, from within and without. Fundamental relationships are being called into question, as is the very basis of marriage and the family. I can only reiterate the importance and, above all, the richness and the beauty of family life.”

“What is at stake here is the identity and survival of the family: father, mother, and children. At stake are the lives of so many children who will be discriminated against in advance, depriving them of the human maturation that God wanted to be given with a father and a mother.”

“[Marriage equality] is not a political struggle; it is the destructive attempt toward God’s plan.”

“”[The push for marriage equality is] the envy of the Devil, by which sin entered the world, which cunningly seeks to destroy the image of God.”

Don’t fall for their lies.

You’re on the clock, rules are the same as when you were in school, phone stays in your pocket.

Just because you’re not an adult and need such rules so you’re able to concentrate, doesn’t mean the rest of us also do.

The wester religion of… islam?

Just asking questions, huh

Sure, here you go.

Compromises are useful when you want something. When your side is about to win you don’t blow up the organization unless you have a mental problem.

Exactly. Like when the north was about to win the civil war, Lincoln allowed some slavery to be legal.

Or when the allies were on the brink of victory, they went and allowed some concentraition camps to open again.

Also, folding and voting against human rights to keep your hand on some property doesn’t sound like winning to me.

Maybe you meant the Charlie Sheen kind of “winning”?

Also, from what I can tell the gay bishops voted for the compromise. If they thought it was the right way to handle it, I am not going to shame them for it.

I will! Fuck them, it was a shit decision, good job appeasing the regressives, well done guys.

That seems to be more of a kick-the-can vote to allow the more conservative churches time to leave.

“We only voted against human rights so the people who are against those human rights can leave with all their money and property intact, we promise!”

Man, you’re making these “progressive” churches sound wonderful!

Francis has made it clear that he is willing to face the issue head-on now that he has the power.

I especially liked it when he faced it head-on in Chile by saying all the allegations were “calumny”.

You dropped this:

/s

He also likes to threaten them with legal action.

I don’t think there’s a standard term for people subscribing to the “woke” ideology.

Empathic?

Decent?

Not a piece of shit?

There’s plenty to choose from.

Notice how he’s only posting clips from made up media as his “arguments”, not anything remotely factual.

Fair point. How about this:

Let’s compare the number of cases a conservative didn’t get consent vs the number of cases a non-consentual kiss brought someone back from clinical death 🙂