Tens of thousands of children, killed or injured. And people wonder how the Palestinians become radicalized against Israel, the West, and the United States, or why there can’t be peace in the Middle East?
Forgiveness is probably the furthest thing from being on their minds.
Authentication is, explicitly, the process of validating that you are who you say you are. Like biometrics, your username is part of your digital identity. So you are correct in arguing that biometrics alone is little stronger than a username, but by definition, both are part of authentication.
That said, to securely authenticate your identity, you need to use multiple factors.
Could you? Yes. But there really is no point— biometrics alone are only a single factor for authentication.
You should have at least two of the three— something you are (fingerprint, facial, or retinal recognition), something you have (badge, token, secure device), and something you know (passphrase).
You can always reflash it with your own if you hold that concern.
PBS beat you to it.
The commercial trucks could fit the equipment, yes. However, you also need to consider the infrastructure. What would be the investment required to replace every truck stop with hydrogen refilling stations?
Could it be done? Yes. Is it the most likely option? Harder to say.
No— it is more viable to set up cryogenic hydrogen infrastructure at an airport than replacing our gas stations with hydrogen stations along our roads today. Additionally, the amount of cooling, insulation, and pressurization equipment required will almost certainly be far too large and expensive to fit in a $20-30k passenger vehicle.
Realistically, if we assume a decarbonized future, it’s seeming that battery electric will be used in most small passenger vehicles (cars and trucks today), whereas hydrogen will be used in heavy equipment (construction, extraction, military) and aviation.
One frustration I have with Community listings has been that the list of “active” users includes bots, and posts with zero comments. I’m having a lot of trouble finding communities in instances that actually have active discussion, particularly with higher counts of unique users contributing content.
While I get the sentiment, historically, readmes have been text only, and should predominately focus on usage options, not a sales pitch. Today in GitHub, these files support markdown, but the level of effort is probably two orders of magnitude higher than a text readme alone.
Think of a readme file on GitHub/distributed with the binary more as a man page than a proper website.
You are trying to solve two different, but related problems, and there are discrete solutions for both.
One is a personal cloud. You need a secure place to store your shit from multiple users and devices, from multiple networks. You’ll need a mostly static IP and dyndns or your own domain, and certificates signed by a public CA/letsencrypt.
Then, you are looking for a backup application that supports rsync or sftp/scp over ssh or vpn, that is also cross compatible (Android and PC/Linux). Point this to the service above, and you are good to go.
Keep in mind that in real life, there are two types of energy radiation, reflection and emission.
First, photos are static records of light at a point in time, and don’t naturally emit light as radiation (in significant enough quantities for consideration). As such, they are only reflective, which is dependent on the light that is already in your environment (e.g., the LEDs in your home are missing huge bands of the spectrum), and as such, these wavelengths may not exist to be reflected by the photo.
Secondly, photos are generated by either film, or based on a cmos/ccd sensor, which are calibrated to capture a subset of em radiation in the human visible spectrum. As such, they have filtered the light that may be usable to other organisms.
So based on both of these, depending on similarity to human eyes, no, most animals (non mammals, in particular) would not see photos in the same way as real life.
This.
At some point, you need to be able to quantify the risk to your business before you can do this.
For instance, if your business earns $10 per transaction, and you perform 100 transactions per second, the difference between five and six nines (313 seconds vs 31 seconds) is $282,000; nowhere near enough to justify the added investment.
Edit: Important to note that for the first example, these are already enormously huge numbers. Such a business, assuming no holidays or weekends, would be grossing $31.5 billion per year, in the same ballpark as Oracle and Coca Cola.
So when we say the company is losing 282,000, this is a tiny, tiny fraction of revenue. Even 99.5%, which is almost two days of downtime, would “only” be a loss of 0.5% of all revenue for the year. Sure, this is $157M, but even that would probably not cover the cost of a six nines infrastructure (that said, they could save up to $120M per year by achieving 99.9%, which would be worth exploring).
Red Hat, the company that is profiting of open source software, is calling another open source developer freeloaders? Rich.
To be pedantic, they have a navy, just no large ships in said navy.