![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5170ed37-415d-42be-a3e7-3edd79eda681.png)
Killing is inhumane.
Killing in self defense might be necessary, yet it does not become humane just because you want it to.
Killing is inhumane.
Killing in self defense might be necessary, yet it does not become humane just because you want it to.
Because I said that killing is inhumane?
Oh I forgot, Russia doesn’t kill anyone, silly me /s
It can be a necessity and still be inhumane.
Having to do something does not make it good, and it’s fine as long as people see it.
That sounds like your average american too.
Nonetheless, if you start thinking that killing is humane because “they deserve it”, I will repeat myself, you have a serious problem.
Because I’m pretty sure that this horrible rapist invader is also convinced that you deserve it, yet I don’t believe you would find their behaviour humane for that reason.
It’s a weird edge case that is between killing and assisted suicide, assuming there is consent.
Euthanasia without consent seems not so humane to me, but once again it is an edge case that is still hard to define.
There is a difference, but if you start saying that shooting an invader is humane, you have a serious problem.
And no one would qualify those as “humane” either. So the argument still stands.
So people kill animals for fun, but when someone suggests using animals to save lives it’s evil?
Fix things in logical order and hopefully by then we’ll have developed other solutions that do not depend on animals. But don’t fight against progress when there are so many horrible and useless things that are allowed at the same time, pick your fights efficiently.
Excuse me, but… What is this braindead piece of crap?
Defending javascript syntax is not really a valid thing. Even js devs admit it.
Python is an overall robust language that allows you to do basically whatever you want, and does it pretty well. You can even use C extensions if you want to get peak performance.
The two domains that I believe Python cannot easily work with, are IoT where the interpreter would be a bit too cumbersome for a low-power system, and web programming, where it would still underperform Javascript and Webassembly (even though I am guessing that with a better webassembly support of the browsers, it would be possible to reach a rather efficient interpreter in-browser that would at least reach performances similar to javascript, if not better. And even if slower, the better syntax and lack of absurd rules would be a clear advantage on JavaScript).
“Use lua if you want a language that allows you to code in a crappy way” is a good argument
Your friend cannot port forward either? I guess you could try to setup a wireguard link between you and your friend too, ahould be faster than hamachi.
Someone tried to learn python and failed.
You can just use port forwarding, and use the broadcast_ips (if I’m not misremembering the name) setting on your friend’s config to try to connect to your public IP.
If you are on windows, the experimental version of the emulator has an overlay (a bit like steam) that allows you to see if you are detecting the other player a bit more easily, and to invite them with just a click (like on steam).
Since it is then direct connection you shouldn’t have any overhead lag unlike with hamachi and the like.
Goldberg emulator. Open source, you put it to replace steam’s api dll, and you can configure it for multiplayer. So you just need clean steam files of the game, and an properly configured goldberg, and the multiplayer works.
Configuration can be a bit of a hassle I guess, but less than editing the source of the game and compiling it.
Multiplayer crack? You just need the clean files and Goldberg, why bother searching for a crack?
Macron? Centrist? Ahah, nice one.