![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
split tunneling is not 100% secure
This keeps being said and I don’t understand why people keep saying it. Split tunneling should be exactly as secure as your route table makes it, shouldn’t it?
split tunneling is not 100% secure
This keeps being said and I don’t understand why people keep saying it. Split tunneling should be exactly as secure as your route table makes it, shouldn’t it?
This was annoying me too, and I solved it by spinning out a VM that exists just to run qbittorrent and the vpn connection.
Flip-flops for the house are great, especially for the kitchen
They were half a letter off. We were so close to perfection
Not just Northern Ireland, if Scotland and Wales fucked off with a unifed Ireland to form Great Ireland without the English.
Imagine the English malding
These do seem to be pretty reasonable arguments.
This timeline is wild
But what about climate wars
It’s a well documented fact that only people who live outside of cities count as people.
That depends on the software in question, but generally it will play a degraded version of the content.
If you haven’t yet, you should try loading kbin as a progressive web app. I find it works quite well that way.
While its nice when a program let’s you pick the egress interface for its network traffic, split tunneling is still on the host os for handling its route table and making sure that’s set up correctly. Like, were people setting up split tunnel networks where they were treating the vpn interface as a proxy, pointing the software at it, and just hoping for the best?