“Don’t underestimate his ability to play spoiler to one of them.”
I think we know which one he’d play spoiler to. Moderate Republicans know how to hold their nose because they’re supposed to. Democrats don’t have that strong of identity politics. It’s much easier for them to be convinced to not vote Dem.
This is especially true for the swing states that are going to determine who actually wins the presidency.
If Dems are oranges and Reps are literal shit. He’d be like a freshly picked mushroom.
It’s gonna taste like shit, it might kill you, but I guess you could say it’s closer to an orange than literal shit, debatably.
Not just anti-vaxx, but also antisemitic conspiracies.
Caring for the people? Sounds like woke radical leftist Marxist propaganda (actual shit I hear on a daily basis).
The Republican party could stop trying to hurt people at any moment. Hell, I’m in a red state and our last Republican governor wasn’t too bad. But it’s all just hate now. And anyone who opposes that hate gets more hate from people like you.
I know. I’m saying the GOP would actually defend his actions and say there’s nothing wrong with it, because that’s what they do.
I understand not wanting to hurt the American people. But Democrats aren’t going to just pretend it’s fine either.
They would absolutely be calling the whole thing a sham.
I understand not wanting to give up power by ousting them in purple areas, for both parties. People’s lives and the trajectory of the country is dependent on which party is in charge, unfortunately. Which is sad in itself.
So, if one of the viewpoints of a controversial issue is based on falsehoods, would they be forced to present it as equal to the other viewpoint? Because if so, I don’t really see that as better.
Everyone knows the Chinese government lied about the virus. It would be more surprising if they hadn’t threatened the doctors.
This wouldn’t be newsworthy even if it wasn’t an Opinion piece.
Can we also ban extreme non-partisan hackery that makes “both sides” claims no matter how extreme one side is.
Wow, I completely forgot that they gave it a name.
Or his “stolen election” claims leading up to Jan 6th. People forget. But the whole thing was initially advertised as a reveal of damning proof.
They’re letting DeSantis carry that torch, like they did with Trump with his open corruption, hate, lack of accountability, racism, etc. If he wins then suddenly it’s okay because it’s just politics, both sides, just an opinion, etc.
Not sure what you’re talking about with the CIA plant stuff. But it looks like he did his time and reformed after smuggling aliens. Good for him.
Also, he has done surprisingly well and pushed for a lot of progressive policies. I think she’s right to call out people for saying he has done nothing. And that doesn’t mean he’s beyond criticism (judges are blocking his online immigrant application requirement thank God).
I don’t care if you like either political party. Buy if you’re indifferent to fascists, then opposing fascists could look fascistic.
What was even the initial lawsuit?
The only way I can see this case happening is if a customer sued because of discrimination. But there was no customer. Who was she suing?
Has he ever been pro-Citizen’s United?
Simply calling him NeoLib seems like a blanket term that probably applies to some of his stances but not others.
Why? Is this an anti-Citizen’s United demonstration?
Can you explain what you mean by this? I assume you mean people forced to stay home by the federal government.