![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Constitutional amendment
Cryptography nerd
Constitutional amendment
This is an interpretation of the constitution, so what congress needs to do it to amend the constitution to explicitly state the president is not immune, and good luck getting that through
Congress can expand the court to put the corrupt asses in minority and them the ruling can be reversed
Only for federal crimes, but that covers most things involving the military anyway
Biden has moved worker rights and more forwards, what’s your point?
He doesn’t have legislative power, that’s the difference. He controls the executive branch, so he can direct law enforcement and regulator agencies and more however he wants. But he can’t single-handedly restrict his own power in a way the next president can’t undo
This was in a conversation about what kind of abusive behavior is acceptable. Do you think it’s also acceptable to be mean to athletes because they too cause damage to their own bodies?
Right and other people don’t get to decide to put a virus in my body, so vaccinate or mask up!
What’s the point when herd immunity is necessary?
Humans learn a lot through repetition, no reason to believe that LLMs wouldn’t benefit from reinforcement of higher quality information. Especially because seeing the same information in different contexts helps mapping the links between the different contexts and helps dispel incorrect assumptions. But like I said, the only viable method they have for this kind of emphasis at scale is incidental replication of more popular works in its samples. And when something is duplicated too much it overfits instead.
They need to fundamentally change big parts of how learning happens and how the algorithm learns to fix this conflict. In particular it will need a lot more “introspective” training stages to refine what it has learned, and pretty much nobody does anything even slightly similar on large models because they don’t know how, and it would be insanely expensive anyway.
Yes, but should big companies with business models designed to be exploitative be allowed to act hypocritically?
My problem isn’t with ML as such, or with learning over such large sets of works, etc, but these companies are designing their services specifically to push the people who’s works they rely on out of work.
The irony of overfitting is that both having numerous copies of common works is a problem AND removing the duplicates would be a problem. They need an understanding of what’s representative for language, etc, but the training algorithms can’t learn that on their own and it’s not feasible go have humans teach it that and also the training algorithm can’t effectively detect duplicates and “tune down” their influence to stop replicating them exactly. Also, trying to do that latter thing algorithmically will ALSO break things as it would break its understanding of stuff like standard legalese and boilerplate language, etc.
The current generation of generative ML doesn’t do what it says on the box, AND the companies running them deserve to get screwed over.
And yes I understand the risk of screwing up fair use, which is why my suggestion is not to hinder learning, but to require the companies to track copyright status of samples and inform ends users of licensing status when the system detects a sample is substantially replicated in the output. This will not hurt anybody training on public domain or fairly licensed works, nor hurt anybody who tracks authorship when crawling for samples, and will also not hurt anybody who has designed their ML system to be sufficiently transformative that it never replicates copyrighted samples. It just hurts exploitative companies.
Remember when media companies tried to sue switch manufacturers because their routers held copies of packets in RAM and argued they needed licensing for that?
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2006/06/yes-slashdotters-sira-really-bad
Training an AI can end up leaving copies of copyrightable segments of the originals, look up sample recover attacks. If it had worked as advertised then it would be transformative derivative works with fair use protection, but in reality it often doesn’t work that way
See also
It’s the same as IPv4 (tunnel) except as mentioned above its still hard to get an IP with the right label
Or instance admins can block and save their users the hassle
Because one or two trolls can be mocked, a whole instance will always only be trouble not worth the effort.
The Swedish green party also kicked down our far right party down the ranks.
Can’t see you here no
Apparently they think they can cover everything but vehicles and ships, and they aren’t losing nearly as many planes to their enemy as Russia has
Curious that you can do the math but then can’t comprehend what the outcome means
You mean when the rail union got what they asked for, because all while Trump supported companies against unions,
https://michiganadvance.com/2023/09/27/uaw-president-says-trump-visit-to-non-union-michigan-company-is-a-pathetic-irony/
The rail union thanked the Biden administration for helping getting their demands through,
https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid
You’re forgetting that the goal of unions isn’t to strike, it’s to protect their member’s rights, and they got their rights. Strikes is one means of applying pressure, Biden applied pressure by other means