It’s Strange
It’s Strange
Removed by mod
Yep the U. Scubba dubba doo!
Just a few examples that come to mind. Additionally, the pronunciation of the individual words included in an acronym DOES NOT determine the pronunciation of that acronym. See SCUBA as an example.
On which axis?
Well, you can tell by the way they use their walk, they’re a traffic bollard, no time to talk
More letters
Astroturfing by Reddit, screaming that sync steals data (which it doesn’t)
I fully disagree on the “sports” aspect in its entirety. Exercise, yes, obvious benefits, and there’s such a great variety than you definitely can find something you enjoy.
But some people simply don’t like team sports or competitions.
I will always prefer to ride my bike, lift weights, etc. than EVER play baseball, tennis, football, or soccer ever again.
Football should not be a disproportionately large portion of a school’s budget when they could also be offering things like group classes, or funding for other clubs which hold functions for non-sports athletics.
Oh sure! So “retirement age” means the age at which the general population is eligible for certain benefits like tax-deferred account withdraw without penalty, social security benefits, Medicare, etc. Politicians generally go WAY past this age, well beyond cognitive decline, because they do not want to lose power.
Office age limits are (and should continue to be) unrelated to retirement age; otherwise it creates an incentive for politicians to RAISE the retirement age even further so that they can stay in office. Republicans already try often to increase the retirement age so that people will be stuck working until they die.
It’s actually going down in the US. And again, I said tie the office age limits to life expectancy, not retirement age.
That’s literally the opposite of what I said
Yep precisely! Sorry, I phrased it poorly. But this is exactly what I meant. If politicians are required to resign at retirement age, it creates a perverse incentive for them to RAISE the retirement age - which would be bad.
If it is tied to life expectancy minus ten years, then it is based on data that adjusts automatically, and it’s less about age itself, more about average life expectancy remaining.
I think that would just result in an even bigger push by right-wing politicians to move the retirement age even higher.
Better would be to tie it to the average life expectancy, updated with each census.
If Republicans could read, they’d be real mad
Also, wrong fucking audience. The people using this are pirating… what do they think is going to happen when they put a paywall in front 😂