![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/dd244808-6dad-4aa8-8fb2-21e2c3aa16c2.png)
![](https://beehaw.org/pictrs/image/cd7879c3-cd1c-4108-806e-f9ca45e9b22a.png)
But his support for riling the base up was of the Tea Party, not MAGA, flavour.
That seems like a distinction without a difference.
But his support for riling the base up was of the Tea Party, not MAGA, flavour.
That seems like a distinction without a difference.
Not to mention it solves nothing for the mass shooting epidemic. Most of them seem suicidal anyway.
deleted by creator
It seems to me that if the point is to preserve the option in case of litigation: having the would-be electors meet, conduct a vote, fill out certificates, and hold them until possible certification by the governor might have been fine. This is basically what happened in Hawaii in 1960 – the Democratic slate was only sent to Washington once certified by the governor.
Going ahead and transmitting them and purporting them to be the actual certificates seems like a fraud.
Damn, big pharma got Ötzi too? /s
IIRC some of the employees who still have company-owned computers, etc have tried numerous times to return them with no response from Twitter. Like you said probably because those people were fired as well.
Outside? No, the excretory inspectors must fully observe the process of urination and defecation from start to finish. No one in Florida must use the toilet unsupervised. Brought to you by the party of Small Government™.
Does the DOJ’s opinion, binding or not, actually matter with respect to this though? Impeachment is solely the prerogative of the House, and more broadly Congress. I don’t see how the DOJ as part of the executive branch can thus bind the House at all in this.
(Also worth noting that Impeachment technically isn’t a legal matter – it is a political process.)