Why would you possibly think it’s good news for Ukraine?

I can’t answer that. I suggest you ask OP that question instead of me.

He just said it’s not historical in any way.

Maybe people here have actually seen real boobs and not that excited about pictures of someone else’s.

Tends to happen as you grow up and get into actual relationships with women.

That’s the funny part. If you think my point is irrelevant, so is yours.

Not at all. But the question I raised from the start was that it matters where the meat is from.

Just like it matters where the plants are from.

Farmers have been using pesticides that kill bees in the millions. That will factually do more harm to the ecosystem than “the meat industry” ever could.

But maybe you want to focus on agriculture that doesn’t use pesticides that are known to kill bees. Maybe then you think it matters. You know, when it suits you.

So the whole point of “but it matters where” is very relevant. A lunch resturant business in London. Isn’t exactly representative of a normal every day person in the slightest.

Also I don’t see why that matters

Yeah, that’s the problem. You can’t even bother to read and understand the studies you link. You see the title and thinks “ah yes, that agrees with my agenda”

meals offered in the lunch service at an institutional food service establishment in London, UK over their whole life cycles.

Maybe you should actually read the studies you link.

Depends on who is farming the plants don’t you think? Not like there hasn’t been scandals about exploitation of workers in agriculture.

Not to mention environmental damage from over fertilizing and pesticides, and dumping of waste.

And again . That varies quite a lot depending on where the meat comes from.

To do what you do and just drag a giant blanket over everything is incredibly ignorant.

And I’m just really over the incredible hypocrisy. Eating meat is wrong cause an animal suffered, but wearing clothes made in a Vietnamese,chineese or Bangladesh sweatshop is ok. Because that only includes human suffering and slave like conditions.

It is two different topics.

I know for fact plenty of vegans think it’s morally wrong to eat another living being. Regardless of how the animal is kept.

You seem to be speaking on behalf of a lot of vegans. I don’t believe “most vegans” believe what you think they do. Certainly not the ones I’ve interacted with.

The almighty “the” meat industry. As if everything is the same everywhere with the same framework, rules, and regulations.

“quick/clean kill, like an arrow to a major artery”

Holy shit, you think getting shot with an arrow produces a “quick/clean” kill? I can’t take anything you say seriously when your idea of a clean kill is a fucking arrow to an artery.

I don’t think they’re more morally correct. Because I don’t think it’s morally incorrect to eat another animal.

We can debate the treatment of animals in how they are kept. But that’s another topic. And a wide one because it varies a lot depending on where you’re from.

People do all the time. We just stopped promoting them.

“In your version, the drone operator seems to have infinite ammo and gleeful fire-at-will orders. Killing anyone who is “just walking down the street.” Maybe the soldiers on the ground operate that way, but not drones or jets.”

Where are you getting this story from? I sure as hell didn’t even come close to mention or talk about anything of the sort.

And regarding your statement

“Intelligence has to prove that these people, or some of them, are Hamas, likely of some significance, maybe not. Then they have to be identified, monitored, and tracked for a strike opportunity. Then, when the entire chain of command is in agreement that that’s their guy and this is the best time, they attack.”

Do you have any source for that being the way they operate at every single strike. Any source that this is how it went down from what we saw? Or are you just guessing?

My money is on the later.

“Neither IDF or Hammas has to provide proof of anything to anybody for any reason except when propagandantistic PR is at play”

That is simply not true. They do have to provide proof to somebody. You said so yourself. To the ones investigating. I can assure you. They are definatly included in these “anybody”

Why do you assume I have that assumption?

Well, first I would have to actually care about what you value and not.

I was talking about the author of the article. But thanks

“While correcting people writing in their native language which isn’t mine is stupid, in this case the term is Roman, so.”

That is your quote. Moron. You fully admit you are trying to correct people.

But sure, try to make it about “prescriptivism” if that’s what you want you absolute clown.

The only cancer is you going around trying to “correct” people when there’s nothing to correct.

They used the word “decimated” accurately.

You’re not preserving the original meaning. You’re just being an ass.