![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/pictrs/image/a18b0c69-23c9-4b2a-b8e0-3aca0172390d.png)
If one owned a real switch would that alter any of the steps? Like, I imagine whatever keys you need would be on it?
For the record I know nothing and am just guesstimating based on 90’s PS1 emulation.
If one owned a real switch would that alter any of the steps? Like, I imagine whatever keys you need would be on it?
For the record I know nothing and am just guesstimating based on 90’s PS1 emulation.
Link gives me a 404 error, am I the only one?
Not the person you’re replying to, but I would second what they’re saying. I recall many years ago reading a post from the Tor browser team explaining that they customise the UA and even browser window size to avoid fingerprinting. It’s not the UA alone, but that in combination with other values the site you’re visiting can detect.
User agent is also the very first thing checked on the below fingerprinting site. I was surprised to see that 0.00% of me have the same user agent as me!
The homeless guy down the street reckons the hospital was bombed by the aliens who live in his ballsack. Are they going to do an article reporting on that next?!
Bruh idk why the difference… Educate me?
Every person in a leadership role at that hospital should do time for this. It’s a disgrace.
I think that’s because you’re used to hearing dates said that way? Over here in DDMMYY-land, we often would say “20th of May, 2024” and that sounds equally sensical to me tbh
If Im reading the GitHub history right, this PR was accepted at age 3 years and 1 day? Guess the cake worked!
Burn the whole god-damned country down and start again.
“the uploader has not made this video available in your country” 😔
While this bill seems alarming, I wish there was a more reputable and less overtly-biased source reporting on this.
While in principle this is a great piece of news, reality isn’t as optimistic and I’d suggest asking questions before deciding to celebrate. When single use plastic shopping bags were outlawed, reusable bag sales went up (as you’d expect), but based on the numbers I saw, the reusable bags cause overall greater levels of emissions and refuse than the plastic they replaced.
In layman’s terms, if a 1-use plastic bag has an environmental cost of “1 carbon”, and a (bigger, heavier, made of multiple things) reusable bag has an environmental cost of “14 carbons”, the reusable bag has to be used 14 times to be a better option, but in practice they’re used around about half that many times before being damaged / thrown away.
Source: live in New Zealand and worked in a relevant part of the grocery industry until 2022.
For anyone wondering, yes the plane is a Boeing 787-9…