Only one of them gets to make the decision to fire the other
EN/NL PhD @ TU Delft CGV Loves EDM, LoL, TFT and MTG
Come join my communities!
Only one of them gets to make the decision to fire the other
Somehow this is just as incoherent as Trump transcriptions
I seem to see a story I believed for years get debunked almost weekly now, thanks
I know exactly what genres to listen for and make an effort to explore new artists and smaller labels
Recently found this: https://youtu.be/y5rYNIE10bw
Now my favourite song of the year at least
If you wanna know chatgpts answer:
No, I do not
“I’m home” is also something say when they arrive in their birth country or birth city/village. It’s different from “I’m at home”.
Tidal, Qobuz, NetEase Cloud Music, Deezer, Apple Music
Everything you mentioned is garbage
If it has digital input (like USB) it’s a DAC+AMP combo
I hope you mean a dedicated DAC, because adding only an Amp doesn’t fix the buzzing
It’s good to know how to rip the opus without reencoding from YouTube but please don’t use this as your primary source of music
If you learn how an encoder works you can compress the FLAC into whatever format you prefer yourself. I highly recommend 256kbps AAC using Apple’s encoder (specifically that encoder, other AAC encoders are much worse) but you can also do VBR MP3 in any bitrate you want. Plus, if you keep the FLACs in archive, you can re-compress them later to a better format if one is developed.
YouTube is absolutely unacceptable quality. The difference is clearly audible even on $5 earbuds. I feel sorry for your ears if you don’t hear the difference, but the vast majority of those who care enough to download music will be able to tell the difference.
I personally pay for Deezer HiFi and save the FLACs locally. Friends mostly do the same with Tidal, but both work well for this purpose.
If you want to find FLACs without paying for a service you can check out rutracker. It has torrents for discographies from a lot of famous artists. Alternatively, you could find a stolen account for one of the previously mentioned services, but that goes too far for my morals because you’re hurting a normal person with a hacked account.
its
There’s a lot of research suggesting the opposite
It would appear to me that there’s not really an “at rest” state in terms of movement in space. We’re on a planet orbiting a sun that orbits the central point of our galaxy, which in turn is also moving and perhaps orbiting something else even bigger. So, “at rest” is always subjective.
Correct, that’s classical relativity, from before the notion of spacetime even existed.
But the twin paradox says if a twin travels away at a high speed then returns, they would have aged less.
It depends on who does the acceleration. Acceleration is key for the twin experiment, and the reason it works is because they are the one accelerating and decelerating. This requires “general” relativity to make sense, it can’t be explained by merely special relativity.
Whatever is influencing us, there must be a 3d vector in space we, as a whole, are moving toward (probably constantly changing though). So, surely if you sent someone in the opposite of that vector, time for them would actually speed up rather than slow down.
I don’t get what you mean here… which 3d vector are you referring to, and why should it exist? One of the important concept is that every reference frame is equally valid.
Would they not “catch up” and be on part overall with time passing?
From one pov the earth sped up, instead of the twin’s spaceship slowing down. These are both valid interpretations. You can always catch up by doing the opposite of what you did before, but you need to look at acceleration for it to make sense. Acceleration is what turns your 4d vector so your reference frame changes, and you can sort of arbitrarily change “passing of time” if you can induce unlimited acceleration.
We wouldn’t see this skew on satellites and the like because they’re travelling with us on that vector but at a constant speed relative to us too. But sending away from us and back, we probably would.
I feel like you’re rediscovering the idea of an “aether” which was disproven by Lorentz and Einstein.
Note that I’m not a physicist, just someone who loves staying up to date with modern physics!
Sort of. You’re already doing it at this moment.
Einstein showed that time is not a separate space, but is actually the same as any other dimension. However, we have not found any way to reverse our direction so far. We can only choose a direction to move forward in. In fact, you’re doing so when you get in a car; you’re experiencing a minor change in how you’re moving through time relative to those around you.
Since the set of all remaining time only shrinks, the possibility of anything ever happening at least once in all time should also shrink unless it already happened.
And things happening at a rate per second doesn’t mean it increases either if it hasn’t happened yet. The probability of me being eaten by a dinosaur today is definitely not higher compared to being eaten by a dinosaur yesterday.
But… that’s true?
December 6th is still coming