• IntegrationLabGod@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is more or less the argument you’d hear from a Biden supporter against packing the court. The counterargument is that the judicial system is already massively politicized so 🤷‍♂️

    • BitSound@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Politicizing is one issue, the other issue is that where do we end up after repeated court packing? We will all be supreme court justices on that blessed day.

      I don’t know that I actually agree with that but it’s at least a realistic fear.

      • Candelestine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This concept that politicization is somehow a bug and not a feature always bugs me. Was there a point in our history when we weren’t politicized, outside of a state of mobilization for war?

        Politics is simply how people make decisions outside of rigid authoritarian structures.

        Trying to eliminate politicization is trying to eliminate representative government by the populace, aka, democratic rule. The people are free to be political, that is all there really is to it.

    • sh00g@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the issue is packing SCOTUS isn’t even a band aid fix to the problem. You’d have to completely overhaul the way the Court works to get a meaningful impact on the way it operates currently. I’ve seen ideas floated like expanding the judiciary and then choosing a certain number of justices randomly to preside over each case, but that is probably worse than our current system because you could end up with an even more radical Court presiding over a very impactful case.