• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because he’s not a military officer, he’s the CEO of a company that manufactures weapons.

      It’s very much “declare war” adjacent, but it isn’t crossing the line as far as NATO is concerned.

    • mecfs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      4 months ago

      Russia has already kidnapped and killed people inside of Europe. I guess it gets treated like espionage.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      It would be Germany’s prerogative to treat it as an act of war. If Germany declines, then there’s no trigger.

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The later NATO gets into the conflict the longer Russia burns themselves out uncontested. If they’re not farming the enemy for resources, as defensive alliances don’t do, then they’ll probably enter the conflict with an overwhelming resource advantage. That’s the strategic angle, and from what I’ve heard NATO hasn’t exactly taken this lying down either.

  • einkorn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yeah, I get it: Sow fear and distrust.

    But this isn’t Russia where you cut of the head of an organisation and it suddenly falters such as Wagner. Rheinmetall wouldn’t stop or even slow down production. Got to keep that revenue going for the shareholders.

    • the_wise_wolf@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s almost as if Putin’s regime was a hyper violent group of thugs, bent on threatening and killing everyone standing in their way of dominance.

        • the_wise_wolf@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          We have to take the thread seriously and accept our adversary as what he is. That doesn’t mean copying his despicable methods. Our most effective defense is defending Ukraine.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Defending Ukraine is not enough.

            We should arm Ukraine way more, and let them use all types of weapon systems on any valid military target, be it in occupied Ukraine or in Russia.

            Edit: of course nobody should bomb civilians or do war crimes.

    • theprogressivist @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m guessing it would’ve been to scare the replacement, but even then, I don’t see weapons slowing down. I think it would have the opposite effect.

      • einkorn@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nah, yay delegation of power.

        It’s the same reason why a modern democratic state is unlikely to crumble when a president gets assassinated: No single person holds all the power and succession is codified. Which is not the case in corruption ridden systems like Russia. There is going to be chaos should Putin not wake up tomorrow.