Wouldn’t it cut down on search queries (and thus save resources) if I could search for “this is my phrase” rather than rawdogging it as an unbound series of words, each of which seems to be pulling up results unconnected to the other words in the phrase?

There are only 2 reasons I can think of why a website’s search engine lacks this incredibly basic functionality:

  1. The site wants you to spend more time there, seeing more ads and padding out their engagement stats.
  2. They’re just too stupid to know that these sorts of bare-bones search engines are close to useless, or they just don’t think it’s worth the effort. Apathetic incompetence, basically.

Is there a sound financial or programmatic reason for running a search engine which has all the intelligence of a turnip?

Cheers!

EDIT: I should have been a bit more specific: I’m mainly talking about search engines within websites (rather than DDG or Google). One good example is BitTorrent sites; they rarely let you define exact phrases. Most shopping websites, even the behemoth Amazon, don’t seem to respect quotation marks around phrases.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I know at least duckduckgo says on their syntax page that they’re aware that operator usage isn’t perfect on their site. Seems to come from the fact that they pull results from multiple sources

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      DDG, because they’re so heavily reliant on bing, has gone to absolute shit recently. I’m just about to quit them. Every link in the top ten goes to some M$N / microsoft-adjacent garbage.

      • Bluefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh so its not just me who thinks its gotten worse then. I was starting to go a little crazy man. It seems like its slowly gottwn worse over time. I wonder if its due to the amount of ai content messing up seo ratings or something

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not just you, no. Microsoft has just gone nuts with their overreach and DDG appears to be collateral damage. After ? A long time of being fine for 90% of what I needed.

      • konalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Duckduckgo is awful at searching for specific memes I need. Sometimes I only remember the text and a rough description of the image, but DDG seems only to consider images with Impact TOP TEXT BOTTOM TEXT captions to be memes. I switch to Google and I find the one I want instantly. If there was a way to have the image results of Google with the web results of DDG my life would be complete

        • ALiteralShovel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If there was a way to have the image results of Google with the web results of DDG my life would be complete

          You might want to look into 4get and SearXNG

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, after some years of DDG getting worse I finally dropped them. I switched to Brave and it’s surprisingly decent for an independent search engine. If you search for something that they don’t have good results for they’ll ask you if you want to get anonymous results from google as well, which means I don’t usually have to switch search engines for harder results.

        They do seem to have a much lower number of image results though.

          • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Why? I’ve never used it, so not disagreeing, but that seems a pretty strong reaction to a search engine.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              it’s more about the browser and by extension the brand, not so much about the search engine per se.

                • pyre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  over the years, too many to count. for me the first red flag was them trying to replace ads with their own “safe” ads, rather than blocking them. they have brave rewards, which i automatically distrust. they push crypto, which is probably their biggest sin. but they also auto added affiliate links to binance urls. just all around shitty, opportunistic goblin vibes.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        every day it looks more and more clear that we’re gonna have no choice but pay for kagi if we want to find anything worth a fuck on the internet

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I believe they’ve said that explicit operators are much more expensive to serve than a regular search, so that’s probably why they don’t respect them. Especially a - operator.

    • DDG doesn’t have their own search index, they’re mostly using Bing and maybe a few fallback providers. They’re entirely reliant on other search engines that they purchase results from, they barely do any actual searching themselves. Things like image search even come from one single source (Bing).