• John_McMurray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean you could just read what she said. Do hermaphrodite produce large gametes? Idk, probably not. Go look it up.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah see the thing is she didn’t say anything like that. She just assumes everyone knows what a “sex class” is to avoid having to define it herself.

          • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Are you some sort of idiot needs a definition of each word used? That’s what dictionaries are for. Anyways she defines what she meant in the complete sentence. Arguing with me about whether or not she’s right is pointless, I didn’t make the statement, merely pointed out she did define it.

            • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              “A woman is someone who belongs to the sex class that produces large gametes.” That’s all she said. No word on what a sex class entails, or whether someone who no longer produces large gametes, or who should produce them but can’t due to a genetic defect, continues to be in it.

              You have one more reply before I report you for being a troll.

              • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                That’s a definition. You don’t have to like it. It doesn’t have to be right. She literally defined her usage you fucking koala.