• IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fungi won’t trade if the tree is not giving a fair offer. So while they don’t trade for profit they sure as hell aren’t engaging in charity.

        • kay@lemmings.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No. Flat out no. There is no competition and they’re literally providing what they are capable of to take care of the others’ need. Mutual aid is not a marketplace and the fact you instinctually thought of it that way tells me you need a book on capitalist realism.

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      There likely could be other benefits to them sharing such as:

      1. when there is more than they can use, particularly that the mushroom does not like in their environment
      2. producing more leaves is likely highly beneficial for the mushroom, for shade both living and fallen, nutrients and cover with fallen leaves.

      Similar for the tree, but also mushrooms are recycling minerals from dead material.

      I don’t know if there’d be “stingy” trees (aside from vastly different nutrient needs), I could see it more of miscommunication or having too much difference with language/biologic pathways.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Trees that rely on myco networks usually only get giant because of previous myco networking bonds, which funnel excess nutrients between not just the fungi but also other trees within the system. And depending on the involved species, this sometimes includes multiple plant species exchanging nutrients.

    • kay@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      change your name. Assuming you aren’t underage so that psychotic pedo fuck would’t be interested.