This is why disabling downvotes on a site fueled by user content is a bad idea.
This is why disabling downvotes on a site fueled by user content is a bad idea.
I could be wrong but I remember voting and they actually had it split into two questions. The first was whether you wanted to keep the current system, and the second was if no what system would you prefer. Unfortunately people just decided to stick to what they were familiar with even if it’s a flawed system.
EDIT: Double checked and yeah, it was two questions the first of which was whether the system should change or not. 61% of voters opted to keep the existing system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_British_Columbia_electoral_reform_referendum
It’s frustrating for sure, I was even more annoyed when we had a referendum in BC and people opted to keep things the same.
What exactly makes you think that communism is going to remove people having power over other people? That seems to just be intrinsic to humans in general, your economic system isn’t going to change that.
And you can absolutely have social support systems in place if the populous pushes for them. Homeless shelters and welfare aren’t impossible ideas, they’re actively implemented across the world. The same goes for basic needs like healthcare.
Just because your government or community hasn’t implemented it doesn’t mean it’s not possible to do so. It means you need to convince those around you that it’s a good idea.
If you’re incapable of working then you take advantage of the social safety nets that your government or community provides.
I never said I was against having supports in place for those who are unable to work?
Depending on the desirability of the work compared to the compensation yes it seems to be working pretty well
In my home town a sanitation worker makes double the provincial minimum wage and gets benefits. That’s an incentive for a job that has a low barrier to entry but undesirable labour.
The benefit of this system is that you can in fact choose this role instead of being assigned it based on the requirements of society. If the compensation isn’t tempting enough then the employer will increase the compensation until it makes sense. That’s how it’s supposed to work at the very least.
If the current implementation isn’t working then you address the issues with the implementation, you don’t tear it all down and try something completely different.
I don’t need any sins, my knees buckle under the weight of my own body just fine.
Depends what we’re substituting those templated values for.
If a society is to function people need to be doing the work that isn’t enjoyable as well as the work that’s enjoyable.
There’s likely not enough people that get genuine enjoyment out of being a garbage man or sewer maintenance worker for a world with everyone doing what they want to work.
You have to add incentives for the less desirable labour or else the system collapses under its own weight.
They didn’t really need to specify the bf is a top when they ended the post with a keyboard smash
The real issue facing our society today is the lack of equal representation for jiggle physics for penis havers.
I like deluge personally - qbittorrent is my fallback though.
Only downside is the memory training times on reboots.
This looks like an office jet pro 8720 which ironically is one of the printers I’ve had the least trouble with.
I’m running an Epson ecotank now though because the price per page is way better.
It’s called a Dyson Big Ball, obviously your balls weren’t big enough.
I’m not sure what in-between there is for “a lot of communist and socialist countries are just as if not more authoritarian than their capitalist counterparts”
The point being made is that the criticism being made doesn’t apply to capitalism in any way that it wouldn’t also apply to other economic systems.
I didn’t know reality was western propaganda, those pesky Americans!
I worry that this little fellow is telling lies to discredit my irrational fears.
He probably hates me too.