BEIJING, Nov 20 (Reuters) - Arab and Muslim ministers called on Monday for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, as their delegation visited Beijing on the first leg of a tour to push for an end to hostilities and to allow humanitarian aid into the devastated Palestinian enclave.
The biggest diplomatic loser from this war is the United States.
It’s reputation and influence is completely trashed in the Middle East.
Not surprised the Russians and Chinese are looking to spread their influence.
Ah yes the US was always viewed so favourably in the Middle East prior to just a month ago.
Are you fucking kidding me?
Where did I say that?
There is a difference from being disliked and being loathed.
Never before has an American Secretary of State been made to wait a day prior to meeting the Leader of Saudi Arabia, met by a minor functionary on an official visit (Turkey), cannot be seen in public with the King of Jordan, etc.
EDIT: Just for clarity, I don’t think it is a great thing that China and Russia are expanding their influence in this region.
The middle east isn’t one homogenous entity, some places were unfavorable and others were ok
This is likely to make them all worse
I mean, have you seen US-KSA relations? The US almost got KSA to normalize relations with Israel jfc
But the ethnic cleansing of muslims IN China I guess is OK.
More whataboutism.
More whatabout whataboutism.
Feels relevant to bring up since they’re putting Beijing and Arabs in the same headline.
Fuck the Uyghurs amirite?
Yea it’s very cute that all these islamic leaders just pretend the ugyars don’t exist but when there is a chance to screw over Israel the first place they visit to ask for humanitarian assistance is the country that is currently ethnicly cleansing an entire population of Muslims. Israel should be called out, but coming from these guys its more about attacking Israel then saving the people of Gaza.
Whataboutism.
whataboutism isn’t the same as pointing out obvious political opportunism aimed at coercing and exploiting the world’s poor, not to mention the rank hypocrisy of those willingly advancing such exploitation under the thinnest guise of virtue.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/reuters/
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Having a bot do this, or combining it with the AutoTLDR bot would be pretty cool. We could have it use a few different sources, and possibly cache the results for efficiency
Say:
📃 Summary
Blah blah blah
⚖️ Media Rating
Rating details
MBFC is literally made by a single guy. Nobody really knows anything about the guy except for what he’s published. The scores are basically pulled out of his ass. I’m not sure if that’s exactly the paragon of free and unbiased journalism.
Tell me you didn’t read through the website without telling me you didn’t read through the website. It’s not just one guy, the founder has a whole team listed on the website and a clear methodology.
You’re just salty because the website isn’t super pro Chinese Communist Party.
Their methodology is arbitrary to the point of being incoherent.
Now, maybe if you could find this guy’s credentials it might give him a bit more credence. Oh, that’s right. You can’t.
The methodology is fine. You just don’t like the results.
